Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 09:52 +0200, Matus UHLAR wrote:
>   
>> On 15.08.09 14:32, Matt Kettler wrote:
>>     
>>> That means it was found and was above your min_cf. i.e.: Razor believes
>>> it is spam.
>>>       
>> There's no min_cf gor RAZOR and there's no public hitcount. RAZOR2 has
>> internal trust system which counts reports and revokes from its
>> users/reporters and uses those to decide if the message is "listed" or not.
>>     
>
> There is -- the minimum confidence level is the second option for the
> check_razor2_range() eval rule.
>
>
>   
You can also set your min_cf in your razor config files, which will
affect when the RAZOR2_CHECK rule fires. This does work in SpamAssassin,
as I have over-ridden the min_cf on my own system, and have done so for
years.

The private part of Razor's trust system has to do with how much impact
your reports have on the cf values everyone else gets when they query
razor. However, you're free to tweak razor to be more or less aggressive.

The razor system also advertizes a suggested cf value, which they call
"ac" (average confidence?) and you can define min_cf to either be your
own absolute value (ie: 10), or relative to the advertized one (ie: 
ac+10, or ac-5).

Razor's cf's go from -100 to +100.

see man razor-agent.conf for further details on how to configure razor,
if you're so inclide.

Reply via email to