That loks like it, is there anyway of having a different report if the
mail is identified as spam cf identified as ham?
On Thu, 2005-29-12 at 20:16 +0100, Patrick von der Hagen wrote:
> tom wright wrote:
> > This dosnt seem to have solved the issue. I'm using the
> > exiscan-acl-4.42-27.patch (ht
tom wright wrote:
>> This dosnt seem to have solved the issue. I'm using the
>> exiscan-acl-4.42-27.patch (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan-acl/) so exim
>> send mails direct to spamassassin at smtp time. I'm no expert here but
>> looking at the code it seems that this passes the message direct to
This dosnt seem to have solved the issue. I'm using the
exiscan-acl-4.42-27.patch (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan-acl/) so exim
send mails direct to spamassassin at smtp time. I'm no expert here but
looking at the code it seems that this passes the message direct to
spamd.
On Thu, 2005-29-12 at 08
Interesting, it looks like I could be calling spamassassin twice (both
through spamc). Once through exim and once with maildrop. I've turned
off the maildrop call and am waiting to see what happens.
On Thu, 2005-29-12 at 11:46 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> tom wright wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > First
tom wright wrote:
> Hi folks,
> First time posting here so thanks in advance for any assistance. Looking
> at my email headers it appears spamassassin is doing an excellent job of
> classifying my email but in the X-Spam-Status header, even when a mail
> is classified as ham I still get a summary m
