Para: Jaime Aguado
CC: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Asunto: Re: Configuration issue
Jaime Aguado wrote:
> Hi all, I have spamassassin 2.64 running on a SuSE Enterprise 9
> running postfix as smtpd.
>
> My spamassassin system is leaking most spam messages (60-80%) without
> tagging
Actually I'd suspect it was amavis doing the rewriting. I understand
it simply uses SA as a score mechanism and discards its markups unless
you tell it otherwise somehow.
Either way it's not an SA issue so you can expect confusion here.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Jaime Aguado" <[E
Jaime Aguado wrote:
> Hi all, I have spamassassin 2.64 running on a SuSE Enterprise 9 running
> postfix as smtpd.
>
> My spamassassin system is leaking most spam messages (60-80%) without
> tagging them.
> I have done some configuration tests:
>
> # spamassassin --lint gives no output error.
>
> #
Jaime,
btw: any special reason you plan to use SA 2.64 with local tests only?
I'd recommend upgrading to the latest and greatest stable version which
can be found (as RPMs for SLES9 on Intel) at
http://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/choeger/spamassassin/i386/sles9/
Take care as the config requires cha
Do you run amavisd-new (which is shipped with SLES9, I think)
If you do, there's the culprit: amavisd-new does its own spam testing
using the spamassassin code directly (not via spamc/spamd)
Details can be found at http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/#faq-spam
Likey you didn't configure amavisd-
ED]
Enviado el: viernes, 27 de enero de 2006 13:49
Para: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Asunto: Re: Configuration issue
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=9.7 required=4.0
This says it is spam. The X-Spam-Report also says that.
It would seem you have aproblem in Postfix, that it is doing something
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=9.7 required=4.0
This says it is spam. The X-Spam-Report also says that.
It would seem you have aproblem in Postfix, that it is doing something wrong
with the message.
Loren
