On 09/09/2014 03:50 PM, Alex Regan wrote:
Hi,
Did you understand that all
tokens are learned, regardless whether they have been seen before?
That doesn't really matter from a user perspective, though, right? I
mean, if there are tokens that have already been learned are learned
again, the net
Hi,
Did you understand that all
tokens are learned, regardless whether they have been seen before?
That doesn't really matter from a user perspective, though, right? I
mean, if there are tokens that have already been learned are learned
again, the net result is zero.
Very much not zero. Each
Hi,
Please use plain-text rather than HTML. In particular with that really
bad indentation format of quoting.
It doesn't seem possible with gmail directly any longer, so I've set up
thunderbird for this. Maybe it is, but not after clicking around in the obvious
places.
It's possible. A li
On Sep 8, 2014, at 7:17 PM, Alex Regan wrote:
>> Please use plain-text rather than HTML. In particular with that really
>> bad indentation format of quoting.
>
> It doesn't seem possible with gmail directly any longer, so I've set up
> thunderbird for this. Maybe it is, but not after clicking a
On Mon, 8 Sep 2014, Alex Regan wrote:
Did you understand that the number of previously not seen tokens has
absolutely nothing to do with auto-learning?
Yes, that was a mistake.
Did you understand that all
tokens are learned, regardless whether they have been seen before?
That doesn't reall
Hi,
Please use plain-text rather than HTML. In particular with that really
bad indentation format of quoting.
It doesn't seem possible with gmail directly any longer, so I've set up
thunderbird for this. Maybe it is, but not after clicking around in the
obvious places.
X-Spam-MyReport: To
Please use plain-text rather than HTML. In particular with that really
bad indentation format of quoting.
On Sat, 2014-09-06 at 17:22 -0400, Alex wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 23:50 -0400, Alex wrote:
> >
> > > > > I looked in the qu
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann
wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 23:50 -0400, Alex wrote:
>
> > > > I looked in the quarantined message, and according to the _TOKEN_
> > > > header I've added:
> > > >
> > > > X-Spam-MyReport: Tokens: new, 47; hammy, 7; neutral, 54; spammy,
On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 23:50 -0400, Alex wrote:
> > > I looked in the quarantined message, and according to the _TOKEN_
> > > header I've added:
> > >
> > > X-Spam-MyReport: Tokens: new, 47; hammy, 7; neutral, 54; spammy, 16.
> > >
> > > Isn't that sufficient for auto-learning this message as spa
Hi,
> > However, spam with scores greater than 9.0 aren't being autolearned:
>
>
http://spamassassin.apache.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_AutoLearnThreshold.html
>
>
> > Sep 2 21:01:51 mail01 amavis[25938]: (25938-10)
> > header_edits_for_quar: ->
> > , Yes, score=16.519 tag=-200 tag2=5 kill=
On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 21:16 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> On 02 Sep 2014, at 20:50 , Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 20:22 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> >> I believe the score threshold is the base score WITHOUT bayes.
> >>
> >> Try running the email through with a -D flag and see what
On 02 Sep 2014, at 20:50 , Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 20:22 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
>> On 02 Sep 2014, at 19:11 , Alex wrote:
>>
>>> However, spam with scores greater than 9.0 aren't being autolearned:
>>
>> I believe the score threshold is the base score WITHOUT bayes.
On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 20:22 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> On 02 Sep 2014, at 19:11 , Alex wrote:
>
> > However, spam with scores greater than 9.0 aren't being autolearned:
>
> I believe the score threshold is the base score WITHOUT bayes.
>
> Try running the email through with a -D flag and see what
On 02 Sep 2014, at 19:11 , Alex wrote:
> However, spam with scores greater than 9.0 aren't being autolearned:
I believe the score threshold is the base score WITHOUT bayes.
Try running the email through with a -D flag and see what you get.
(And that is only a partial answer, the threshold num
On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 21:11 -0400, Alex wrote:
> I have a spamassassin-3.4 system with the following bayes config:
>
> required_hits 5.0
> rbl_timeout 8
> use_bayes 1
> bayes_auto_learn 1
> bayes_auto_learn_on_error 1
> bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 9.0
> bayes_expiry_max_db_size 950
> bayes
15 matches
Mail list logo
