Hi,

> > However, spam with scores greater than 9.0 aren't being autolearned:
>
>
http://spamassassin.apache.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_AutoLearnThreshold.html
>
>
> > Sep  2 21:01:51 mail01 amavis[25938]: (25938-10)
> > header_edits_for_quar: <bmu011...@bmu-011.hichina.com> ->
> > <bestd...@example.com>, Yes, score=16.519 tag=-200 tag2=5 kill=5
> > tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, KAM_LINKBAIT=5,
> > LOC_DOT_SUBJ=0.1, LOC_SHORT=3.1, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.347,
> > RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT=1.449, RCVD_IN_PSBL=2.3,
> > RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT1=0.01, RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT2=0.01, RDNS_NONE=0.793,
> > RELAYCOUNTRY_CN=0.1, RELAYCOUNTRY_HIGH=0.5, SAGREY=0.01] autolearn=no
> > autolearn_force=no
> >
> > I've re-read the autolearn section of the docs,
>
> The one I linked to above?

Yes, and the FAQ entry regarding reasons why autolearn doesn't work.

> I looked in the quarantined message, and according to the _TOKEN_
> header I've added:
>
> X-Spam-MyReport: Tokens: new, 47; hammy, 7; neutral, 54; spammy, 16.
>
> Isn't that sufficient for auto-learning this message as spam?
>
> That has absolutely nothing to do with auto-learning. Where did you get
> the impression it might?

If the conditions for autolearning had been met, I understood that it would
be those new tokens that would be learned.

> > I just wanted to be sure this is just a case of not enough new points
> > (tokens?) for the message to be learned, and that I I wasn't doing
> > something wrong.
>
> Points: aka score, used in the context of per-rule (per-test) and
> overall score classifying a message based on the required_score setting.
>
> Token: think of it as "word" used by the Bayesian classifier sub-system.
> In practice, it is more complicated than simply space separated words.
> Context (e.x. headers) and case might be taken into account, too.

Okay, of course I understood the difference between points and tokens.
Since the points were over the specified threshold, I thought those new
tokens would have been added.

I'll continue reading and experimenting. Posting very late again. Thanks
guys for your help, as always.

Thanks,
Alex

Reply via email to