On Wed, 24 Oct 2012, Cathryn Mataga wrote:
On 10/24/2012 8:35 AM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
24.10.2012 18:19, Ned Slider kirjoitti:
> I have had very good success running adjusted scores for BAYES rules,
> but I am very careful how I train my bayes database. I've disabled
> auto-learning and
On 10/24/2012 8:35 AM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
24.10.2012 18:19, Ned Slider kirjoitti:
I have had very good success running adjusted scores for BAYES rules,
but I am very careful how I train my bayes database. I've disabled
auto-learning and only manually train on hand-checked ham and spam
examp
24.10.2012 18:19, Ned Slider kirjoitti:
> I have had very good success running adjusted scores for BAYES rules,
> but I am very careful how I train my bayes database. I've disabled
> auto-learning and only manually train on hand-checked ham and spam
> examples. Consequently, I find the extremes (BA
On 22/10/12 19:15, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 10/22, JP Kelly wrote:
Should I set the BAYES_99 score high enough to trigger as spam?
I get plenty of spam getting through which does not get caught because BAYES_99
is the only rule which fires and it is not set to score at or above the
thr
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 10/23, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
22.10.2012 21:15, dar...@chaosreigns.com kirjoitti:
Huh, ruleqa doesn't track hits to BAYES_99?
If it did, against which database it would do that?
It would show the hit rates in the corpora of the masschec
On 10/23, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> 22.10.2012 21:15, dar...@chaosreigns.com kirjoitti:
> > Huh, ruleqa doesn't track hits to BAYES_99?
> If it did, against which database it would do that?
It would show the hit rates in the corpora of the masscheck submitters,
like everything else. So, the datab
22.10.2012 21:15, dar...@chaosreigns.com kirjoitti:
> Huh, ruleqa doesn't track hits to BAYES_99?
If it did, against which database it would do that?
Just askin...
--
"I'm out of options for now. It is something that has gone wrong "in the
apt-get region" (can't find a good expression for that
On 10/22, JP Kelly wrote:
> Should I set the BAYES_99 score high enough to trigger as spam?
> I get plenty of spam getting through which does not get caught because
> BAYES_99 is the only rule which fires and it is not set to score at or above
> the threshold.
You could. Some people only use ba
John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, MySQL Student wrote:
meta LOCAL_BAYES_RTF(BAYES_99 && LOCAL_CTYP_RTF)
score LOCAL_BAYES_RTF 1.5
describe LOCAL_BAYES_RTF Rule by AS: Probably an Inline RTF spam
If the only thing it's complaining about during lint is the zero sc
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, MySQL Student wrote:
meta LOCAL_BAYES_RTF(BAYES_99 && LOCAL_CTYP_RTF)
score LOCAL_BAYES_RTF 1.5
describe LOCAL_BAYES_RTF Rule by AS: Probably an Inline RTF spam
mimeheader LOCAL_CTYP_RTFContent-Type =~
/^application\/octet-stream.\.rtf/i
score
>
>
> Post your entire scoring block for LOCAL_BAYES_RTF
meta LOCAL_BAYES_RTF(BAYES_99 && LOCAL_CTYP_RTF)
score LOCAL_BAYES_RTF 1.5
describe LOCAL_BAYES_RTF Rule by AS: Probably an Inline RTF spam
mimeheader LOCAL_CTYP_RTFContent-Type =~
/^application\/octet-stream.\
On 22 Jun, 2009, at 12:50 , MySQL Student wrote:
Ideas greatly appreciated.
Post your entire scoring block for LOCAL_BAYES_RTF
--
Updated to be PRCE compatible after 400 years: /(bb|[^b]{2})/
The debug output is saying that the meta rule, LOCAL_BAYES_RTF, has a
dependency, BAYES_99, which has a 0 score.
In the score line, there are two zero values. ;) It depends what
scoreset you're running in.
Also, just because 50_scores.cf has something set doesn't mean
something later on doesn't c
13 matches
Mail list logo
