> > Not as far as ok_locales and the respective CHARSET_FARAWAY rules are
> > concerned, IIRC. They have been written long ago to trigger on the
> > char-sets used. They don't detect the char-set based on the actual
> > payload.
>
> So where does that leave us? With the need for an update or addi
> From: Jason Bertoch [mailto:ja...@i6ix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 3:34 PM
> On 2010/05/25 7:02 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 10:35 +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
> >
> > Not as far as ok_locales and the respective CHARSET_FARAWAY rules are
> > concerned, IIRC. They
On 2010/05/25 7:02 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 10:35 +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
Not as far as ok_locales and the respective CHARSET_FARAWAY rules are
concerned, IIRC. They have been written long ago to trigger on the
char-sets used. They don't detect the char-set based on
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 10:35 +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
> On 05/26/2010 05:24 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > Unfortunately, in this case, the fact that it isn't a proper, raw
> > message is not irrelevant. The ok_locales setting, which is part of your
> > original question, depends on the char-set
On 05/26/2010 05:24 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, in this case, the fact that it isn't a proper, raw
> message is not irrelevant. The ok_locales setting, which is part of your
> original question, depends on the char-set used. Which is missing from
> the sample. We only can assu
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 12:51 -0400, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> On 2010/05/25 10:48 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > It is not a FN. It isn't even a proper message.
> >
> > That's some headers, plus a screen-scraped, rendered version of the
> > message, including the most common headers displayed to th
On 2010/05/25 10:48 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 09:27 -0400, Jason Bertoch wrote:
A user reported the following FN [...]
It is not a FN. It isn't even a proper message.
That's some headers, plus a screen-scraped, rendered version of the
message, including the most com
> On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 09:27 -0400, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> > A user reported the following FN [...]
>
> It is not a FN. It isn't even a proper message.
>
> That's some headers, plus a screen-scraped, rendered version of the
> message, including the most common headers displayed to the user.
>
>
On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 09:27 -0400, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> A user reported the following FN [...]
It is not a FN. It isn't even a proper message.
That's some headers, plus a screen-scraped, rendered version of the
message, including the most common headers displayed to the user.
Without a RAW sam
On 2010/05/24 6:17 PM, Jason Haar wrote:
On 05/25/2010 09:47 AM, RW wrote:.
My guess is that none of of these is being hit because there's
enough English mixed-in with the Arabic.
I think the "FARAWAY" rules and other locale checks are dependent on
email using the old, pre-Unicode "charset" fo
> On 05/25/2010 09:47 AM, RW wrote:.
> > My guess is that none of of these is being hit because there's
> > enough English mixed-in with the Arabic.
> >
> I think the "FARAWAY" rules and other locale checks are dependent on
> email using the old, pre-Unicode "charset" formatting.
>
> Yesterday I h
On 05/25/2010 09:47 AM, RW wrote:.
> My guess is that none of of these is being hit because there's
> enough English mixed-in with the Arabic.
>
I think the "FARAWAY" rules and other locale checks are dependent on
email using the old, pre-Unicode "charset" formatting.
Yesterday I had some G
On Mon, 24 May 2010 16:21:15 -0400
Jason Bertoch wrote:
> I was really more interested in the language aspect, though. I
> expected to see more rules match because of my ok_locales setting.
> To be honest, I really don't know which rules look at that setting.
AFAIK the point of ok_locales is t
On 2010/05/24 1:50 PM, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Jason was speaking about a FN, not an FP. Am I missing something?
Yes, this was a FN.
These are the findings with one of my setup (SA 3.3.1, all locales allowed):
Content analysis details: (11.8 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name
> On Mon, 24 May 2010, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> At a guess I would say the bulk of your score is attributed to the
> URI in the body that has been flagged as being on the SURBL blocklist.
>
> Beyond that, the issue seems to be that they have used a body 'type' of
> text/html without actually using H
On Mon, 24 May 2010, Jason Bertoch wrote:
A user reported the following FN to me which is written in an Arabic
character set. I have "ok_locales en" set, but I don't see any rules hitting
that appear language related. I also found the normalize_charset option, but
don't know if it will help o
16 matches
Mail list logo
