> On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 09:27 -0400, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> > A user reported the following FN [...]
>
> It is not a FN. It isn't even a proper message.
>
> That's some headers, plus a screen-scraped, rendered version of the
> message, including the most common headers displayed to the user.
>
> Without a RAW sample, there isn't much we could do. And no, the results
> posted by some helpful folks are irrelevant, cause they fed SA that
> non-sample.
Well, I think Jason only munged the recipient address.
What's the matter with this message? Did you try this?
http://pastebin.com/download.php?i=KtQSvZ5w
g
