On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:50:29 +0100
Axb wrote:
> URL blacklists should be named *domain blacklists"
No, I think they should be named URL blacklists. A "domain blacklist",
in my opinion, refers to the blacklisting of an email sender's domain.
Regards,
David.
On 2011-12-06 16:39, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 12/6/2011 12:59 AM, Dorian Chan wrote:
Hello all,
I've attached a newer version with Windows info. Thanks Daniel,
Patrick, and Ted.
A few comments:
1) There are multiple types of blacklists and whitelists. IP
blacklists, URL blacklists, and address
On 12/6/2011 12:59 AM, Dorian Chan wrote:
> Hello all,
> I've attached a newer version with Windows info. Thanks Daniel,
> Patrick, and Ted.
A few comments:
1) There are multiple types of blacklists and whitelists. IP
blacklists, URL blacklists, and address blacklists. IP and URL
blacklists (an
Am Dienstag, den 29.11.2011, 21:30 -0800 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt:
... is that really so clear ?
> under 'what is spamassassin' you need to clarify that SA is not run
> on e-mail clients like desktops, that it is run on mailservers.
--
Peace,
Thomas
4296 Trier * Germany
Phone: +49-651-1456530 * Fax: +49-651-14565329 Commercial register number HRB
4920 (AG Wittlich) http://www.jam-software.com
From: Kevin A. McGrail
[mailto:kmcgr...@pccc.com]<mailto:[mailto:kmcgr...@pccc.com]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 4:21 AM
To: antiamoeba; Danie
>
> It's not always just branding. It's also, giving proper attribution.
> Organisations and people should be credited appropriately for
> their contributions. It's the respectful thing to do.
> "GNU/Linux" is the best example of this IMO.
>
> At least you said "free software arena" and not "o
On 11/30/2011 4:32 AM, spamassas...@lists.grepular.com wrote:
"GNU/Linux" is the best example of this IMO.
IMO, that is the most controversial example you could have picked. I
believe Debian and FSF are the only people that recognize that branding
for Linux. Not arguing one side or the other
On 30/11/11 07:17, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>>> I've attached version 2.0 with this email (it's the clean version without
>>> all the comments :) ). I've pretty much finished up the definitions and
>>> some cleaning up. Again, I would really enjoy feedback!
>>
>> Everywhere you say "SpamAssassin"
Dorian,
* Dorian Chan :
> Hello again,
> I've attached version 2.0 with this email (it's the clean version without
> all the comments :) ). I've pretty much finished up the definitions and
> some cleaning up. Again, I would really enjoy feedback!
I've attached an edited version that adds puts SA
On 11/29/2011 10:58 PM, Michael Parker wrote:
On Nov 29, 2011, at 9:13 PM, Dorian Chan wrote:
Hello again,
I've attached version 2.0 with this email (it's the clean version without all
the comments :) ). I've pretty much finished up the definitions and some
cleaning up. Again, I would really
On 11/30/2011 1:58 AM, Michael Parker wrote:
Everywhere you say "SpamAssassin" you should probably be saying "Apache
SpamAssassin."
Michael
PS Kevin, this also applies to the listing on the Google Code-In site, is that
something that can be fixed?
Good call. Editing the GCI site would be pa
On Nov 29, 2011, at 9:13 PM, Dorian Chan wrote:
> Hello again,
> I've attached version 2.0 with this email (it's the clean version without all
> the comments :) ). I've pretty much finished up the definitions and some
> cleaning up. Again, I would really enjoy feedback!
>
Everywhere you say "
symantec doesn't use spamassassin and does not use the name mailscanner.
mailscanner is an open source program. It uses spamassassin to scan
mail.
I would also suggest that at the top of the document that you put in
something along the lines of "this document is intended to be read by
[insert y
KAM did that in the first reply.
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>
> * Dorian Chan :
>> Sorry, I don't really think the nabble attachment option really worked,
>> so
>> I'll actually attach it. Sorry for that!
>
> It worked both times, but the document is almost unreadable because its
> filled
> wit
Ah, that would make a difference. Carry on!
Ted
On 11/29/2011 3:02 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
A note for those unfamiliar with GCI that these are 13 to 17 year old
kids getting an introduction to open source. Thanks for the feedback!
Regards,
KAM
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Well, here's m
A note for those unfamiliar with GCI that these are 13 to 17 year old kids
getting an introduction to open source. Thanks for the feedback!
Regards,
KAM
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Well, here's my $0.02
For starters, is it realistic to think that someone charged with
implementing spamassassin on
Well, here's my $0.02
For starters, is it realistic to think that someone charged with
implementing spamassassin on a mailserver does not know what spam is?
The first 2 sections are fluff and would be best replaced by a link to
wikipedia's spam entry, along with the warning "if you need to
re
* Dorian Chan :
> Sorry, I don't really think the nabble attachment option really worked, so
> I'll actually attach it. Sorry for that!
It worked both times, but the document is almost unreadable because its filled
with comments. Can you post a clean version?
p@rick
--
state of mind ()
Digitale
18 matches
Mail list logo
