RE: myfanbox.com

2011-11-08 Thread Mynabbler
R - elists wrote: > > why not just save processor cycles & make it easier... reject the below at > smtp time > > sms.ac > fanbox.com > fanboxnotes.com > myfanbox.com > We have a ruleset here, since I want to see what they send, and your list is incomplete: header MN_FANBOX From =~ /(smsacfri

Re: myfanbox.com

2011-11-07 Thread Kris Deugau
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: On 11/07, Kris Deugau wrote: I'm pretty sure this is a legitimate social networking site, and I have *definitely* received several not-spam reports from customers for some of their emails. How sure are you that those not-spam reports weren't wrong? It fooled me,

Re: myfanbox.com

2011-11-07 Thread darxus
On 11/07, Kris Deugau wrote: > I'm pretty sure this is a legitimate social networking site, and I > have *definitely* received several not-spam reports from customers > for some of their emails. How sure are you that those not-spam reports weren't wrong? It fooled me, until I actually talked to t

Re: myfanbox.com

2011-11-07 Thread Kris Deugau
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: I'd like to get this added to the default rule set, any objections? header FROM_MYFANBOX From:addr =~ /\@myfanbox\.com$/i score FROM_MYFANBOX 5 I'm pretty sure this is a legitimate social networking site, and I have *definitely* received several not-spam reports

Re: myfanbox.com

2011-11-07 Thread Joseph Brennan
header FROM_MYFANBOX From:addr =~ /\@myfanbox\.com$/i We've blocked 208.69.101/24 at the SMTP level since December 2008 because of user reports about spam. To stay on this long (and this is a very long time) means both that they keep sending and that no one here has ever asked us to allow the

Re: myfanbox.com

2011-11-06 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 16:23 -0800, John Hardin wrote: On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: However, John, I strongly urge you NOT to include that rule in your sandbox for stock. This is the wrong thing to do, and basically contradicts ev

Re: myfanbox.com

2011-11-06 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 16:23 -0800, John Hardin wrote: > On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > > > However, John, I strongly urge you NOT to include that rule in your > > > > sandbox for stock. This is the wrong thing to do, and basically > > > > contradicts everything SA stands for. >

Re: myfanbox.com

2011-11-06 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 12:47 -0800, John Hardin wrote: On Sun, 6 Nov 2011, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: However, John, I strongly urge you NOT to include that rule in your sandbox for stock. This is the wrong thing to do, and basically contradicts e

Re: myfanbox.com

2011-11-06 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 12:47 -0800, John Hardin wrote: > On Sun, 6 Nov 2011, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > > However, John, I strongly urge you NOT to include that rule in your > > sandbox for stock. This is the wrong thing to do, and basically > > contradicts everything SA stands for. > > I susp

Re: myfanbox.com

2011-11-06 Thread Simon Loewenthal
John Hardin wrote: On Sun, 6 Nov 2011, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > However, John, I strongly urge you NOT to include that rule in your > sandbox for stock. This is the wrong thing to do, and basically > contradicts everything SA stands for. I suspect the corpora and the scoring logic won't mak

Re: myfanbox.com

2011-11-06 Thread John Hardin
On Sun, 6 Nov 2011, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: However, John, I strongly urge you NOT to include that rule in your sandbox for stock. This is the wrong thing to do, and basically contradicts everything SA stands for. I suspect the corpora and the scoring logic won't make it have much effect a

Re: myfanbox.com

2011-11-06 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 11:17 -0800, John Hardin wrote: > On Sun, 6 Nov 2011, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: > > > I'd like to get this added to the default rule set, any objections? Yes, strong objections. SA is NOT a blacklist in any way. Adding domains just like that is not what SA does. The upd

RE: myfanbox.com

2011-11-06 Thread R - elists
> > On Sun, 6 Nov 2011, darxus > > > I'd like to get this added to the default rule set, any objections? > > > > header FROM_MYFANBOX From:addr =~ /\@myfanbox\.com$/i score > > FROM_MYFANBOX 5 > > Not at that score. > > I'll add it to my sandbox right now so we can see what happens. > >

Re: myfanbox.com

2011-11-06 Thread John Hardin
On Sun, 6 Nov 2011, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: I'd like to get this added to the default rule set, any objections? header FROM_MYFANBOX From:addr =~ /\@myfanbox\.com$/i score FROM_MYFANBOX 5 Not at that score. I'll add it to my sandbox right now so we can see what happens. -- John Hardi