RE: Tsunami warning hits the spam barrier

2005-07-08 Thread Chris Santerre
>-Original Message- >From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 10:33 PM >To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >Subject: Re: Tsunami warning hits the spam barrier > > >From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> O

Re: Tsunami warning hits the spam barrier

2005-07-08 Thread jdow
From: "Kelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Loren Wilton wrote: > > You must not be referring to the La Palma in/near Los Angeles. > > A number of us would be rather pleased to see it slide into the ocean. > > The only problem there is it would have to slide through several other > cities... ;-) Can

Re: Tsunami warning hits the spam barrier

2005-07-08 Thread Kelson
Loren Wilton wrote: You must not be referring to the La Palma in/near Los Angeles. A number of us would be rather pleased to see it slide into the ocean. The only problem there is it would have to slide through several other cities... ;-) -- Kelson Vibber SpeedGate Communications

Re: Tsunami warning hits the spam barrier

2005-07-08 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote on Thu, 07 Jul 2005 22:16:57 -0400: > *That* is what the article said -- "the problem arises if [SA] is > installed straight out of the box, the messages are NOT considered spam". and goes on "But for anyone who locks down the spam filter, SpamAssassin categorizes the e

Re: Tsunami warning hits the spam barrier

2005-07-07 Thread Loren Wilton
> All we hope for is that a system is in place by the time half of > LaPalma slides into the ocean. If the predictions are correct, our > gulf coast/florida real estate will need all new maps. The > Indonesian tsunami was a ripple in the bathtub in comparison > according to some doomsayers.

Re: Tsunami warning hits the spam barrier

2005-07-07 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 07 July 2005 22:16, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: >Gene Heskett wrote: >> On Thursday 07 July 2005 21:15, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: >>>Justin Mason wrote: however, it'd be nice to get a copy with full headers so we could think about whitelisting it ;) - --j. >The p

Re: Tsunami warning hits the spam barrier

2005-07-07 Thread jdow
From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Thursday 07 July 2005 21:15, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > >Justin Mason wrote: > >> however, it'd be nice to get a copy with full headers so we could > >> think about whitelisting it ;) > >> > >> - --j. > >> > >>>The problem arises if the open source fi

Re: Tsunami warning hits the spam barrier

2005-07-07 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Gene Heskett wrote: On Thursday 07 July 2005 21:15, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: Justin Mason wrote: however, it'd be nice to get a copy with full headers so we could think about whitelisting it ;) - --j. The problem arises if the open source filter is installed straight out of the box; the

Re: Tsunami warning hits the spam barrier

2005-07-07 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 07 July 2005 21:15, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: >Justin Mason wrote: >> however, it'd be nice to get a copy with full headers so we could >> think about whitelisting it ;) >> >> - --j. >> >>>The problem arises if the open source filter is installed straight >>> out of the box; the message

Re: Tsunami warning hits the spam barrier

2005-07-07 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Justin Mason wrote: however, it'd be nice to get a copy with full headers so we could think about whitelisting it ;) - --j. The problem arises if the open source filter is installed straight out of the box; the messages (usually written in upper case) are not considered spam. According to

Re: Tsunami warning hits the spam barrier

2005-07-07 Thread Justin Mason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 yeah, I saw that -- the message scores 3.7 according to the report, well under 5. It's pretty reckless to lower the threshold enough to cause that to hit as spam. however, it'd be nice to get a copy with full headers so we could think about whitelis