DAve wrote:
D Hill wrote:
To me that rule looks fine. Perhaps your testing is completely within
your trusted path? Feed the message with SpamAssassin with the -D
debug switch to see for sure.
That is how I have been testing it.
spamassassin -D < test-mail 2>&1 | grep invaluement
No joy, no
D Hill wrote:
On Fri, 23 May 2008 at 10:32 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Good morning all,
I am trying to use SA to test a DNSBL and I am not having any luck
getting the rule to hit. I've looked through 20_dnsbl_tests.cf, and
read the appropriate section in the docs.
http://spamas
Rob McEwen wrote:
DAve wrote:
I am trying to use SA to test a DNSBL
PLEASE--note that direct queries to the invaluement.com DNSBLs will
*always* fail.
These are *only* available via RSYNC. So please don't try to add SIP to
your RBL list... it won't work!!!
(Dave knows this... I'm just men
>
> I am trying to use SA to test a DNSBL and I am not having any luck
> getting the rule to hit. I've looked through 20_dnsbl_tests.cf, and read
> the appropriate section in the docs.
>
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#
> rule_definitions_and_privileged
DAve wrote:
I am trying to use SA to test a DNSBL
PLEASE--note that direct queries to the invaluement.com DNSBLs will
*always* fail.
These are *only* available via RSYNC. So please don't try to add SIP to
your RBL list... it won't work!!!
(Dave knows this... I'm just mentioning this for ot
On Fri, 23 May 2008 at 10:32 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Good morning all,
I am trying to use SA to test a DNSBL and I am not having any luck getting
the rule to hit. I've looked through 20_dnsbl_tests.cf, and read the
appropriate section in the docs.
http://spamassassin.apache.o
