Re: Spamassassin requiring 30-40 MB per process and ghost load

2005-07-21 Thread Loren Wilton
> http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm lists it as "Active", although it > hasn't been updated in over a year. Hum. I wonder why that is. Guess I'll go ask! Loren

RE: Spamassassin requiring 30-40 MB per process and ghost load

2005-07-21 Thread Rosenbaum, Larry M.
> From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Also, I'm pretty sure the 99_fraud file is very old. I believe we dropped > filenames outside the 7x series some time ago. http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm lists it as "Active", although it hasn't been updated in over a year.

Re: Spamassassin requiring 30-40 MB per process and ghost load

2005-07-21 Thread Loren Wilton
> I´m using SpamAssassin 3.0.4 with ´spamd´ / spamc and each process uses about > 20 MB + 14MB shared This is not unusual for 3.0 with some SARE rules. >From the look at your stats, you have too many spamd children - you should cut back to 4 or 5 probably. While you don't seem to be swapping, yo

Re: Spamassassin requiring 30-40 MB per process and ghost load

2005-07-21 Thread Kai Schaetzl
wrote on Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:33:07 +0200: > I´m using SpamAssassin 3.0.4 with ´spamd´ / spamc and each process uses about > 20 MB + 14MB shared You wanted to say 40, did you? Looks like a normal size to me. You won't be able to get it much lower. It depends on the amount of rules you use and