> Starting out with another clean database, further testing
> shows that in fact the message was learned when I ran
> 'spamassassin -r' (though bayes_toks remained at 12288
> bytes), and the same message was learned again when I ran
> 'sa-learn --spam' (and the size once again grew to 24576 bytes)
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 7:56 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -report
>
> Starting out with another clean database, further testing
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 7:56 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -report
>
> Starting out with another clean database, further testing
> s
I understand. In the test I had an issue with, the database started out (at
least appears to be) empty, I ran 'spamassassin -r' and the size did not
change, then I ran sa-learn, and it did. Certainly not as good a test as
actually checking the contents of the database:
-rw--- 1 amavis ama
Gary V wrote:
> It did work this time. Even with the spamcop error...
>
> sfa:~# su amavis -c 'sa-learn --dump magic'
> 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
> 0.000 0 7 0 non-token data: nspam
> [...]
>
> sfa:~# su amavis -c 'spama
Gary V wrote:
> It did work this time. Even with the spamcop error...
>
> sfa:~# su amavis -c 'sa-learn --dump magic'
> 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
> 0.000 0 7 0 non-token data: nspam
> [...]
>
> sfa:~# su amavis -c 'spamas
Sorry for toppost, but seems right in contect.
Is is possible that if spamassassin -r < spam.eml fails one of the
remote tests (like spamcop, 'too old') that it doesn't go on to any of
the other tests?
is report to spamcop done BEFORE the baysian learning?
Original Message
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 10:27:55PM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> > Sa coach sends stream to spamd with 'TELL' protocol.
> > It then calls the equivalent of 'spamassassin -r' (for spam) or '-z
> > for ham' or -f for forget.
> >
> > Do I need to call sa-learn --ham and sa-learn --spam also?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 12:07 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -report
>
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 10:27:55PM -0400, Michael Scheidel
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 10:27:55PM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> Sa coach sends stream to spamd with 'TELL' protocol.
> It then calls the equivalent of 'spamassassin -r' (for spam) or '-z for
> ham' or -f for forget.
>
> Do I need to call sa-learn --ham and sa-learn --spam also?
No.
> If I c
10 matches
Mail list logo
