Re: SA Timed out..

2010-06-09 Thread Alex
Hi, > The reported stackdump just shows a routine that was executing at > the time when timer expired. It often shows the problem section > (like a database access), but may just show an innocent bystander > code which happened to be normally executing at the time. Great, thanks. How about from a

Re: SA Timed out..

2010-06-09 Thread Mark Martinec
Alex, > I have a server that's frequently pretty busy during the day, and just > started to notice these messages periodically: > > Jun 8 13:35:39 mail01 amavis[28784]: (28784-272) SA TIMED OUT, > backtrace: at /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i386-linux/IO/Select.pm line > 104\n\tIO::Select::can_read('IO::

Re: SA timed out

2007-11-01 Thread Robert Fitzpatrick
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 16:28 -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > > I have the following error message in the logs, didn't even notice until > > tracking down an email for a user today, but been happening in all my > > logs back the last week. All three servers running mai

Re: SA timed out

2007-11-01 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: I have the following error message in the logs, didn't even notice until tracking down an email for a user today, but been happening in all my logs back the last week. All three servers running mail filtering to pgsql db have this error including the server which hosts t

Re: SA TIMED OUT

2006-12-05 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 06:42:01PM +0100, Stefan Jakobs wrote: > Here an other hint: > Every day I execute the following command and force an expire of the Bayes DB: > /usr/bin/sa-learn --dbpath /var/amavis/.spamassassin > -p /var/amavis/.spamassassin/user_prefs -u vscan --force-expire > > In l

Re: SA TIMED OUT

2006-12-05 Thread Stefan Jakobs
Am Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2006 18:16 schrieb Theo Van Dinter: > On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 06:11:56PM +0100, Stefan Jakobs wrote: > > > > 71\n\tMail::SpamAssassin::Locker::jittery_one_second_sleep('Mail::Spa > > > >mAss assin::Locker::UnixNFSSafe=HASH(0x9747010)') > > > > > > Are you using NFS? If not

Re: SA TIMED OUT

2006-12-05 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 06:11:56PM +0100, Stefan Jakobs wrote: > > > 71\n\tMail::SpamAssassin::Locker::jittery_one_second_sleep('Mail::SpamAss > > >assin::Locker::UnixNFSSafe=HASH(0x9747010)') > > > > Are you using NFS? If not, switch to flock. > > No, I don't use NFS. What do you mean with "swit

Re: SA TIMED OUT

2006-12-05 Thread Stefan Jakobs
Am Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2006 16:12 schrieb Theo Van Dinter: > On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 04:06:17PM +0100, Stefan Jakobs wrote: > > Dec 5 15:32:58 server amavis[23505]: (23505-01-24) SA TIMED OUT, > > backtrace: at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Locker.pm > > line 71\n\teval {...}

Re: SA TIMED OUT

2006-12-05 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 04:06:17PM +0100, Stefan Jakobs wrote: > Dec 5 15:32:58 server amavis[23505]: (23505-01-24) SA TIMED OUT, backtrace: > at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Locker.pm line 71\n\teval > {...} called at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Locker.p

Re: SA TIMED OUT message debian sarge (new error)

2006-11-03 Thread Mark Martinec
Simon, > Looks like ive solved one issue, and another crops up!... I think that > i may need to move to a mysql storage engine here? approx 17,000 > messages a day incoming on this server. > Any pointers here? - Thanks!! > > Nov 4 11:39:40 mx1 amavis[32148]: (32148-07) SA TIMED OUT, backtrace: >

RE: SA TIMED OUT message debian sarge (new error)

2006-11-03 Thread Gary V
Hi There, Looks like ive solved one issue, and another crops up!... I think that i may need to move to a mysql storage engine here? approx 17,000 messages a day incoming on this server. Any pointers here? - Thanks!! Nov 4 11:39:40 mx1 amavis[32148]: (32148-07) SA TIMED OUT, backtrace: at /usr/

Re: SA TIMED OUT message debian sarge

2006-11-03 Thread Simon
On 11/3/06, Mark Martinec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Friday November 3 2006 05:23, Matt Kettler wrote: > I believe the option is $sa_timeout > Not sure what the default is, probably 30. Which should be enough to > prevent that problem, unless you have a LOT of sa instances contending > for the

Re: SA TIMED OUT message debian sarge

2006-11-03 Thread Mark Martinec
On Friday November 3 2006 05:23, Matt Kettler wrote: > I believe the option is $sa_timeout > Not sure what the default is, probably 30. Which should be enough to > prevent that problem, unless you have a LOT of sa instances contending > for the AWL database. > Try adding a $sa_timeout = 60 to your

Re: SA TIMED OUT message debian sarge

2006-11-02 Thread Matt Kettler
Simon wrote: > On 11/3/06, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Simon wrote: >> > Hi There, >> > >> > Using spamassassin 3.1.3-0bpo1 from backports.org on debian sarge. We >> > did have the standard 3.0.x sarge package. Using amavis-new to call >> > spamassassin and after upgrading spamassass

Re: SA TIMED OUT message debian sarge

2006-11-02 Thread Gary V
Is your amavis set with an abnormally short timeout for SA? Hmm.. Where do find this setting in my amavis conf file? The default is 30 seconds (at least in older versions of amavisd-new). You can add: $sa_timeout = 50; As Matt says, 'lock_method flock' will also help. Are you using Pyzor?

Re: SA TIMED OUT message debian sarge

2006-11-02 Thread Simon
On 11/3/06, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Simon wrote: > Hi There, > > Using spamassassin 3.1.3-0bpo1 from backports.org on debian sarge. We > did have the standard 3.0.x sarge package. Using amavis-new to call > spamassassin and after upgrading spamassassin we are now getting these > m

Re: SA TIMED OUT message debian sarge

2006-11-02 Thread Matt Kettler
Simon wrote: > Hi There, > > Using spamassassin 3.1.3-0bpo1 from backports.org on debian sarge. We > did have the standard 3.0.x sarge package. Using amavis-new to call > spamassassin and after upgrading spamassassin we are now getting these > messages in the mail.log. Would someone please be able

Re: SA TIMED OUT

2006-10-27 Thread M. Lewis
Gary V wrote: spamassassin -D --lint is giving me an error: [2533] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: dcc_timeout 18 BTW, as Matt says, your DNS may be slow. If DCC doesn't respond within 10 seconds, I would imagine it's unlikely it will respond - so I wouldn't waste time waiting a

Re: SA TIMED OUT

2006-10-27 Thread M. Lewis
Gary V wrote: I upgraded to SA 3.1.4 last night and now I have two issues that I'm trying to resolve: (1) spamassassin -D --lint is giving me an error: [2533] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: dcc_timeout 18 You need to enable (uncomment) the DCC plugin in v310.pre Done and th

Re: SA TIMED OUT

2006-10-27 Thread M. Lewis
Matt Kettler wrote: M. Lewis wrote: I upgraded to SA 3.1.4 last night and now I have two issues that I'm trying to resolve: (1) spamassassin -D --lint is giving me an error: [2533] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: dcc_timeout 18 If you've not edited /etc/mail/spamassassin/v310.pre

RE: SA TIMED OUT

2006-10-27 Thread Gary V
spamassassin -D --lint is giving me an error: [2533] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: dcc_timeout 18 BTW, as Matt says, your DNS may be slow. If DCC doesn't respond within 10 seconds, I would imagine it's unlikely it will respond - so I wouldn't waste time waiting around another 8

RE: SA TIMED OUT

2006-10-27 Thread Gary V
I upgraded to SA 3.1.4 last night and now I have two issues that I'm trying to resolve: (1) spamassassin -D --lint is giving me an error: [2533] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: dcc_timeout 18 You need to enable (uncomment) the DCC plugin in v310.pre (2) In the logs I'm seeing

Re: SA TIMED OUT

2006-10-27 Thread Matt Kettler
M. Lewis wrote: > > I upgraded to SA 3.1.4 last night and now I have two issues that I'm > trying to resolve: > > (1) > spamassassin -D --lint is giving me an error: > [2533] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: dcc_timeout 18 If you've not edited /etc/mail/spamassassin/v310.pre to load th