Rules that are encapsulated by if
blocks still fail dependency checks because the dependency checks
do not parse the if blocks.
For example, the rule using
__ KAM_BODY_LENGTH_LT_128 has a check for the required code.
In any case, you can ignore these depe
I'm seeing the same thing with the KAM rules in SA 3.3.1. I pull KAM.cf down
from http://www.peregrinehw.com/downloads/SpamAssassin/contrib/KAM.cf placing
it in /etc/mail/spamassassin. Is that not the place to get the KAM rulesets?
I grab it with a cron.daily script - not sure if there's a ch
On Tue, 21 May 2013, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 5/20/2013 10:51 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
> > These rules are mine so they naturally caught my eye...
> >
> > > rules: meta test __HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST_MINFP has undefined
> > > dependency
> > > '__RCD_RDNS_MAIL'
> > > rules: meta test __HDR
On 5/20/2013 10:51 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
These rules are mine so they naturally caught my eye...
rules: meta test __HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST_MINFP has undefined dependency
'__RCD_RDNS_MAIL'
rules: meta test __HDRS_LCASE_1K has undefined dependency
'__SINGLE_HEADER_1K'
rules: meta test TO_NO_BRKTS
Hi,
>> These rules are mine so they naturally caught my eye...
>>
>>> rules: meta test __HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST_MINFP has undefined dependency
>>> '__RCD_RDNS_MAIL'
>>> rules: meta test __HDRS_LCASE_1K has undefined dependency
>>> '__SINGLE_HEADER_1K'
>>> rules: meta test TO_NO_BRKTS_DIRECT has un
Hi,
> These rules are mine so they naturally caught my eye...
>
>> rules: meta test __HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST_MINFP has undefined dependency
>> '__RCD_RDNS_MAIL'
>> rules: meta test __HDRS_LCASE_1K has undefined dependency
>> '__SINGLE_HEADER_1K'
>> rules: meta test TO_NO_BRKTS_DIRECT has undefined
On Sun, 19 May 2013, Alex wrote:
These rules are mine so they naturally caught my eye...
rules: meta test __HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST_MINFP has undefined dependency
'__RCD_RDNS_MAIL'
rules: meta test __HDRS_LCASE_1K has undefined dependency '__SINGLE_HEADER_1K'
rules: meta test TO_NO_BRKTS_DIRECT