On 06/22/2014 05:14 AM, Paul Stead wrote:
Hi Steve,
If you run sa-learn with the -D debug option, you'll see that most of
the time is during startup.
Yeah, I kinda figured. But I'm sure I read in the wiki or somewhere that
--no-sync was supposed to be "much faster" for learning individual e
Hi Steve,
If you run sa-learn with the -D debug option, you'll see that most of the time
is during startup.
I believe - correct me if I'm wrong - that spamc is the better option to use as
it will connect to existing spamd processes and is much quicker overall
Check it out - http://spamassassi
Hi,
I just have a question about the expected performance of salearn with
the --nosync option. Working with the default backend, with a bayes_toks
file size of less and 1 MB, it's taking about 1.5 seconds to learn 1
small email message without --no-sync, and about 1.3 seconds with
--no-sync.
