Hi Steve, If you run sa-learn with the -D debug option, you'll see that most of the time is during startup.
I believe - correct me if I'm wrong - that spamc is the better option to use as it will connect to existing spamd processes and is much quicker overall Check it out - http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/spamc.html Paul On 22/06/14 02:15, Steve Bergman wrote: Hi, I just have a question about the expected performance of salearn with the --nosync option. Working with the default backend, with a bayes_toks file size of less and 1 MB, it's taking about 1.5 seconds to learn 1 small email message without --no-sync, and about 1.3 seconds with --no-sync. Are these times reasonable? I had read in the docs that --no-sync was supposed to speed things up greatly. Learning large numbers of emails with a single sa-learn command is quite fast. It can learn 1000 emails in about 15 seconds. But I have need to do a single mail at a time as quickly as possible, with a sync happening later. This is with SA 3.3 as shipped with the latest Debian Stable. Thanks for any feedback, Steve Bergman -- Paul Stead, Zen Internet Systems Engineer Direct: 01706 902018 Fax: 01706 902170 Web: zen.co.uk Fibre Optic Broadband offers download speeds as high as 76Mbps. Check your Fibre broadband availability here: http://www.zen.co.uk/business/broadband/fibre-optic-broadband.aspx This message is private and confidential. If you have received this message in error, please notify us and remove it from your system. Zen Internet Limited may monitor email traffic data to manage billing, to handle customer enquiries and for the prevention and detection of fraud. We may also monitor the content of emails sent to and/or from Zen Internet Limited for the purposes of security, staff training and to monitor quality of service. Zen Internet Limited is registered in England and Wales, Sandbrook Park, Sandbrook Way, Rochdale, OL11 1RY Company No. 03101568 VAT Reg No. 686 0495 01
