2004 4:35 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Problems with SURBL and catching stuff..
Hi,
Perhaps someone can help here. I have recently added the SURBL
functionality to my SpamAssassin installation, and things seem to work
wonderfully. However, we do on a fairly regular basis seem t
On Wednesday, November 3, 2004, 5:30:08 AM, Matt Matt wrote:
> Right.. and rightly they are.. What I'm wondering is.. is there anyway
> to get spamassassin to detect characteristics of these spams so as to
> mark them when we are the 'first hit' before they get into the
> SURBLs... obviously someon
Right.. and rightly they are.. What I'm wondering is.. is there anyway
to get spamassassin to detect characteristics of these spams so as to
mark them when we are the 'first hit' before they get into the
SURBLs... obviously someone has to be first, so spamassassin may not
mark them as spam. That's
On Wednesday, November 3, 2004, 5:09:24 AM, Matt Matt wrote:
> I'll be more then h appy to report them, but is there anything we can
> do to get spamassassin to detect them more?
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by more. If they get
into SURBLs, they will be detected by SpamAssassin insta
I'll be more then h appy to report them, but is there anything we can
do to get spamassassin to detect them more?
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 04:51:21 -0800, Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 3, 2004, 4:45:24 AM, Matt Matt wrote:
>
>
> > I figured as much (that the messages j
On Wednesday, November 3, 2004, 4:45:24 AM, Matt Matt wrote:
> I figured as much (that the messages just weren't in the SURBL lists,
> but I'd still like to find a way to mark them =) Here attached is one
> that looks alot like the ones that come through (my apologies... clean
> your eyes out with
I figured as much (that the messages just weren't in the SURBL lists,
but I'd still like to find a way to mark them =) Here attached is one
that looks alot like the ones that come through (my apologies... clean
your eyes out with soap afterwards). This account that received it
is kinda a 'spam t
On Tuesday, November 2, 2004, 1:35:26 PM, Matt Matt wrote:
> Perhaps someone can help here. I have recently added the SURBL
> functionality to my SpamAssassin installation, and things seem to work
> wonderfully. However, we do on a fairly regular basis seem to be the
> "first" to get hit with t
Hi!
Perhaps someone can help here. I have recently added the SURBL
functionality to my SpamAssassin installation, and things seem to work
wonderfully. However, we do on a fairly regular basis seem to be the
"first" to get hit with the spam. What I mean is that spamassassin
will catch it only
Hi,
Perhaps someone can help here. I have recently added the SURBL
functionality to my SpamAssassin installation, and things seem to work
wonderfully. However, we do on a fairly regular basis seem to be the
"first" to get hit with the spam. What I mean is that spamassassin
will catch it only
10 matches
Mail list logo
