Re: spamassassin4.x problem

On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 10:47:43AM +0100, natan wrote: > 1)Spamassassin3.x: > spamassassin -D -t w6.elm > > -- --- >  1.0 URIBL_BLOCKED  ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was >     blocked.  See

Re: spamassassin4.x problem

rote: IP ban may make sense - but there was a similar problem with another machine also with spamassin4.x - after returning to 3x there was no problem Are you SURE there was NO problem? Or is it possible that the problem *just isn't reported* in SA3? (i.e. SA4 has better reporting than SA3)

Re: spamassassin4.x problem

On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 05:13:43PM +0100, natan wrote: > IP ban may make sense - but there was a similar problem with another machine > also with spamassin4.x - after returning to 3x there was no problem Are you SURE there was NO problem? Or is it possible that the problem *just isn'

Re: spamassassin4.x problem

Benny Pedersen skrev den 2025-02-14 00:05: Bill Cole skrev den 2025-02-13 21:29: On 2025-02-13 at 11:13:43 UTC-0500 (Thu, 13 Feb 2025 17:13:43 +0100) natan Feb 13 17:02:06 amavis5 amavis[9316]: (09316-01) _WARN: check: dns_block_rule RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED hit, creating /var/amavis/v

Re: spamassassin4.x problem

ect was the same One machne who cat /etc/resolv.conf nameserver 127.0.0.1 IP ban may make sense - but there was a similar problem with another machine also with spamassin4.x - after returning to 3x there was no problem The difference is that SA 3.x doesn't do anything about BLOCKED r

Re: spamassassin4.x problem

etc/resolv.conf nameserver 127.0.0.1 IP ban may make sense - but there was a similar problem with another machine also with spamassin4.x - after returning to 3x there was no problem The difference is that SA 3.x doesn't do anything about BLOCKED responses The VALIDITY rules should b

Re: spamassassin4.x problem

: On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 04:11:52PM +0100, natan wrote: I have a couple of servers on all of them with spamassassin3x and I have no problem and on one where there is spamassassin4 I have problems as above To put it even simpler 90% of traffic is handled by servers with spamassassin3x where I have no

Re: spamassassin4.x problem

Hi Sorry but University debate The machines were 1:1 clones For testing, I also updated debian11 -> debian12 to rule out other issues and the effect was the same One machne who cat /etc/resolv.conf nameserver 127.0.0.1 IP ban may make sense - but there was a similar problem w

Re: spamassassin4.x problem

On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 04:11:52PM +0100, natan wrote: > I have a couple of servers on all of them with spamassassin3x and I have no > problem > and on one where there is spamassassin4 I have problems as above > > To put it even simpler 90% of traffic is handled by servers with &

Re: spamassassin4.x problem

@Benny Okay what don't you understand in this thread? I have a couple of servers on all of them with spamassassin3x and I have no problem and on one where there is spamassassin4 I have problems as above To put it even simpler 90% of traffic is handled by servers with spamassassin3x wh

Re: spamassassin4.x problem

natan skrev den 2025-02-13 15:01: Hi Thenx for help but  this url is not very clear I have own resolver ii  pdns-recursor  4.1.11-1+deb10u2 amd64    PowerDNS Recursor ii  rbldnsd    1.0~20210120-2 amd64    small nameserver daemon designed for DNSBLs dig test.uribl.com.multi.uribl.

Re: spamassassin4.x problem

natan skrev den 2025-02-13 12:03: Spamasaasin4.x gets less traffic than others. and now please show the real problem, not workarounds

Re: spamassassin4.x problem

Hi Thenx for help but  this url is not very clear I have own resolver ii  pdns-recursor  4.1.11-1+deb10u2 amd64    PowerDNS Recursor ii  rbldnsd    1.0~20210120-2 amd64    small nameserver daemon designed for DNSBLs dig test.uribl.com.multi.uribl.com txt +short @127.0.0.1 "permanen

Re: spamassassin4.x problem

natan writes: > Feb 13 11:48:14 amavis5 amavis[934307]: (934307-01) SA info: async: > aborting after 4.815 s, deadline shrunk: URIBL, > A/kra20at.cc.multi.surbl.org, rules: URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL, > URIBL_CR_SURBL, URIBL_MW_SURBL, URIBL_DM_SURBL, URIBL_PH_SURBL, > SURBL_BLOCKED, URIBL_CT_SURBL This c

spamassassin4.x problem

Hi Another Problem wher I found when I migrate to Spamassasin-4.x spamassassin -V SpamAssassin version 4.0.0   running on Perl version 5.36.0 many times in log I get: Feb 13 11:48:14 amavis5 amavis[934307]: (934307-01) SA info: async: aborting after 4.815 s, deadline shrunk: URIBL, A

Re: another problem in disable in spamassassin

On 12.04.24 10:50, natan wrote: I have problem with disabled spamhaus.org in spamassassin: In local.cf I disable check like: ... dns_query_restriction deny spamhaus.org dns_query_restriction deny zen.spamhaus.org dns_query_restriction deny dbl.spamhaus.org But in mail.log I fund still

another problem in disable in spamassassin

Hi I have problem with disabled spamhaus.org in spamassassin: In local.cf I disable check like: ... dns_query_restriction deny spamhaus.org dns_query_restriction deny zen.spamhaus.org dns_query_restriction deny dbl.spamhaus.org ... But in mail.log I fund still checking RCVD_IN_PBL, URIBL_CSS_A

Re: URIBL_SBL and spamhouse problem

natan skrev den 2024-03-15 09:30: Yes but this disable all URIBL_* where I use *.spamhouse.net i never asked you to add * now you know your own mistake, good weekend

Re: URIBL_SBL and spamhouse problem

Hi Yes but this disable all URIBL_* where I use *.spamhouse.net I have spamassassin-3.4.6 and URIBL_* works fine but payment is not so cool W dniu 14.03.2024 o 22:21, Benny Pedersen pisze: natan skrev den 2024-03-14 16:04: in 00_init_dns.cf: # dns_query_restriction (allow|deny) domain1 domai

Re: URIBL_SBL and spamhouse problem

natan skrev den 2024-03-14 16:04: in 00_init_dns.cf: # dns_query_restriction (allow|deny) domain1 domain2 . dns_query_restriction allow dq.spamhaus.net dns_query_restriction deny zen.spamhaus.net ... In: /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004006/updates_spamassassin_org/ do not edit or add any new fil

Re: URIBL_SBL and spamhouse problem

W dniu 14.03.2024 o 13:13, Benny Pedersen pisze: natan skrev den 2024-03-14 12:20: I have disable only spamahause rules URIBL_SBL URIBL_CSS URIBL_SBL_A URIBL_CSS_A URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED URIBL_DBL_SPAM URIBL_DBL_PHISH  URIBL_DBL_MALWARE URIBL_DBL_BOTNETCC URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_SP

Re: URIBL_SBL and spamhouse problem

natan skrev den 2024-03-14 12:20: I have disable only spamahause rules URIBL_SBL URIBL_CSS URIBL_SBL_A URIBL_CSS_A URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED URIBL_DBL_SPAM URIBL_DBL_PHISH URIBL_DBL_MALWARE URIBL_DBL_BOTNETCC URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_SPAM URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_REDIR URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_PHISH URI

URIBL_SBL and spamhouse problem

Hi Today I get e-mail from spamhouse "Hello Support, I recently sent over a email regarding IP addresses querying the Spamhaus threat feeds.  The mentioned IP addresses are actively querying our public mirrors, and exceeding our usage limits.  Checking our database, I’m unable to locate an a

Re: Problem installing Spamassassin 4.0.0 on Ubuntu 23.10 Server

On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 09:59 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > > On Feb 14, 2024, at 06:12, Ken Wright > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I've built a mail server and I wanted to include Spamassasin.  > > > > As noted above, the machine is running Ubuntu Server 23.10, so > > > > I started wit

Re: Problem installing Spamassassin 4.0.0 on Ubuntu 23.10 Server

> On Feb 14, 2024, at 06:12, Ken Wright > wrote: > > I've built a mail server and I wanted to include Spamassasin.  As > noted above, the machine is running Ubuntu Server 23.10, so I > started with > >   sudo apt install spamassassin spamc > > but I can't start the spamassassin.service; the error

Re: Problem installing Spamassassin 4.0.0 on Ubuntu 23.10 Server

On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 06:15 +0100, Niels Kobschätzki wrote: > > > On Feb 14, 2024, at 06:12, Ken Wright > > wrote: > > > > I've built a mail server and I wanted to include Spamassasin.  As > > noted above, the machine is running Ubuntu Server 23.10, so I > > started with > > > >   sudo apt ins

Re: Problem installing Spamassassin 4.0.0 on Ubuntu 23.10 Server

On Feb 14, 2024, at 06:12, Ken Wright wrote: I've built a mail server and I wanted to include Spamassasin. As noted above, the machine is running Ubuntu Server 23.10, so I started with sudo apt install spamassassin spamc but I can't start the spamassassin.service; the error message I get whe

Re: Problem installing Spamassassin 4.0.0 on Ubuntu 23.10 Server

> On Feb 14, 2024, at 06:12, Ken Wright wrote: > > I've built a mail server and I wanted to include Spamassasin. As noted > above, the machine is running Ubuntu Server 23.10, so I started with > > sudo apt install spamassassin spamc > > but I can't start the spamassassin.service; the error

Problem installing Spamassassin 4.0.0 on Ubuntu 23.10 Server

I've built a mail server and I wanted to include Spamassasin. As noted above, the machine is running Ubuntu Server 23.10, so I started with sudo apt install spamassassin spamc but I can't start the spamassassin.service; the error message I get when I run sudo systemctl start spa

Re: some problem with spam

ink is random too like: https://paste.debian.net/1300874/ W dniu 12.12.2023 o 12:21, Jimmy pisze: uri     __ADB_CPN_LINK /\.campaign\.adobe\.com\/r\/\?/ rawbody __IMG_SRC_CID   / wrote: Hi I have a SpamAssassin version 3.4.6 And I try resolv two p

Re: some problem with spam

t the overall score accordingly. > > Jimmy > > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 5:53 PM natan wrote: > >> Hi >> I have a SpamAssassin version 3.4.6 >> >> And I try resolv two problem >> >> 1)I put eml with spam and learn SA like: >> sa-learn --

Re: some problem with spam

ssassin version 3.4.6 And I try resolv two problem 1)I put eml with spam and learn SA like: sa-learn --spam /root/spamik/ In /root/spamik/ is 4 e-mail Worsk great but after 7 day i must learn agin like SA forgot what he learned 2)I have a problem with one type a spam

Re: some problem with spam

uri __ADB_CPN_LINK /\.campaign\.adobe\.com\/r\/\?/ rawbody __IMG_SRC_CID / wrote: > Hi > I have a SpamAssassin version 3.4.6 > > And I try resolv two problem > > 1)I put eml with spam and learn SA like: > sa-learn --spam /root/spamik/ > > In /root/spamik/ is 4 e-m

some problem with spam

Hi I have a SpamAssassin version 3.4.6 And I try resolv two problem 1)I put eml with spam and learn SA like: sa-learn --spam /root/spamik/ In /root/spamik/ is 4 e-mail Worsk great but after 7 day i must learn agin like SA forgot what he learned 2)I have a problem with one type a spam like

Re: Fwd: spamassassin4.x - problem

Do you have any unmaintained or self-maintained SA Plugins (eg CRM114)?

Re: spamassassin4.x - problem

pat...@patpro.net skrev den 2023-06-21 13:33: June 21, 2023 12:59 PM, "Matija Nalis" wrote: Another way to prove that the problem is exclusively in spamassassin is to reproduce the problem ONLY with spamassassin (i.e. without dovecot, amavisd, etc. being involved at all) - e.g. b

Re: spamassassin4.x - problem

June 21, 2023 12:59 PM, "Matija Nalis" wrote: > Another way to prove that the problem is exclusively in spamassassin > is to reproduce the problem ONLY with spamassassin (i.e. without > dovecot, amavisd, etc. being involved at all) - e.g. by manually > running "spa

Re: spamassassin4.x - problem

On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 12:00:41PM +0200, natan wrote: > I tested via configurations > > 1)dovecot10 + spamassasin-3.x - problem not exists > 2)dovecot11 + spamassasin-3.x - problem not exists > 3)dovecot10 + spamassasin-4.x - problem exists > 4)dovecot11 + spamassasin-4.

Re: spamassassin4.x - problem

amavisd, eg change from spamassassin to spamdclient, and then start spamd does this leave temp files still ? is cpan latest trunk version ?, i fear its not This is problem not in amavis or system but in spamassassin-4. Problem not exists in this sam machine in older spamassasin like spamassasin

Re: spamassassin4.x - problem

eg change from spamassassin to spamdclient, and then start spamd does this leave temp files still ? Note: Look in /tmp then, not in /var/lib/amavis/tmp

Re: spamassassin4.x - problem

natan skrev den 2023-06-21 10:05: Hi Files such as .spamassassin are deleted but not all. Files that are not deleted do not appear to be invalid I build spamassassin-4.x from cpan - not from repo Workaound solutions is not good but works find /var/lib/amavis/tmp/.spam* -mmin +200 -delete; I'd

Re: spamassassin4.x - problem

Hi Files such as .spamassassin are deleted but not all. Files that are not deleted do not appear to be invalid I build spamassassin-4.x from cpan - not from repo Workaound solutions is not good but works find /var/lib/amavis/tmp/.spam* -mmin +200 -delete; I'd rather not use it though I thinki

Re: spamassassin4.x - problem

: Hello, I'm running amavisd-new (milter) with spamassassin 4.x on FreeBSD, both from pkg, and I see the same problem. It appears that my /var/amavis/tmp holds every single sspamassassin tmp file from the day I've upgraded to 4.x. Did you upgrade or reconfigure Amavis at the same time

Re: spamassassin4.x - problem

nning amavisd-new (milter) with spamassassin 4.x on FreeBSD, both from pkg, and I see the same problem. It appears that my /var/amavis/tmp holds every single sspamassassin tmp file from the day I've upgraded to 4.x. Did you upgrade or reconfigure Amavis at the same time? I did not

Re: spamassassin4.x - problem

i don't belive debian is more helpfull reinstall gives same problem as you have now FWIW, I cannot reproduce the issue either on (Debian bookworm with standard packages) or (Debian bullseye with SA4 from CPAN), so it is not categorically broken. /var/lib/amavis/tmp/ C

Re: spamassassin4.x - problem

pfull reinstall gives same problem as you have now vim /etc/amavisd.conf note for spamassassin 4.x there is many plugins with bugs unless debian maintainers do a diff -urp oldtarball newfilesdir >patch.patch i do this patch from spamassassin 4 to sa-trunk, no problems wait for 4.0.1 else

Re: spamassassin4.x - problem

both from >> pkg, and I see the same problem. It appears that my /var/amavis/tmp holds >> every single sspamassassin tmp file from the day I've upgraded to 4.x. >> > > Did you upgrade or reconfigure Amavis at the same time? I did not upgrade. I did not reconfigur

Re: Fwd: spamassassin4.x - problem

In debian11 with spamasassin-4.x root@amavis-4:~# su - amavis $ perl -Mv5.14 -MFile::Spec -e 'say File::Spec->tmpdir' /tmp In debian11 with spamassassin-3.4.x root@amavis5:~# su amavis $ perl -Mv5.14 -MFile::Spec -e 'say File::Spec->tmpdir' /tmp Nevermind, Debian's amavis actually defines TMP

Re: spamassassin4.x - problem

On 2023-06-20 at 09:39:04 UTC-0400 (Tue, 20 Jun 2023 15:39:04 +0200) Patrick Proniewski is rumored to have said: Hello, I'm running amavisd-new (milter) with spamassassin 4.x on FreeBSD, both from pkg, and I see the same problem. It appears that my /var/amavis/tmp holds every s

Re: Fwd: spamassassin4.x - problem

W dniu 20.06.2023 o 16:50, Damian pisze: For test I downgrade one spamassassin from 4.x to 3.4.6 and problem not exists Hm, I don't see any significant code-difference regarding tempfiles. any idea ? root@a48c6a1d5fb0:~# sudo -u amavis perl -Mv5.14 -MFile::Spec -e 'say File::Sp

Re: Fwd: spamassassin4.x - problem

For test I downgrade one spamassassin from 4.x to 3.4.6 and problem not exists Hm, I don't see any significant code-difference regarding tempfiles. any idea ? root@a48c6a1d5fb0:~# sudo -u amavis perl -Mv5.14 -MFile::Spec -e 'say File::Spec->tmpdir' /tmp What output do you get?

Re: spamassassin4.x - problem

Hello, I'm running amavisd-new (milter) with spamassassin 4.x on FreeBSD, both from pkg, and I see the same problem. It appears that my /var/amavis/tmp holds every single sspamassassin tmp file from the day I've upgraded to 4.x. cheers. > On 20 Jun 2023, at 15:07, natan wrote

Fwd: spamassassin4.x - problem

Hi I have extrenal serwers with amavis+spamassassin (via cpan) 4 of them debian10 and spamassin-3.4.4 2 of them debian11 and spamassassin-4.x I have a problem (only debianb10 and spamassassin-4.x) with many many files like ".spamassassin99712ZzMoDatmp" in /var/lib/amavis/tmp/

Re: ExtractText options in user_prefs, spamd problem

\tpdftotext\t.pdf application/pdf is there any problem with extracttext options when spamd is used? e.g. are they considered rules? (user rules are disabled by default iirc) On 07.10.22 12:17, Henrik K wrote: They are not allowed in user_prefs extracttext_use extracttext_external Dunno if the

Re: ExtractText options in user_prefs, spamd problem

t; /home/uhlar/.spamassassin/user_prefs (line 48): > extracttext_use\t\tpdftotext\t.pdf application/pdf > > is there any problem with extracttext options when spamd is used? > > e.g. are they considered rules? (user rules are disabled by default iirc) They are not allowed in user

ExtractText options in user_prefs, spamd problem

(line 47): extracttext_external\tpdftotext\t/usr/bin/pdftotext -nopgbrk -layout -enc UTF-8 {} - Oct 7 09:29:05 fantomas spamd[26887]: config: failed to parse line in /home/uhlar/.spamassassin/user_prefs (line 48): extracttext_use\t\tpdftotext\t.pdf application/pdf is there any problem with

Re: Askdns problem ?

;t know if that's because of the number of TXT RRs involved or what. I've seen a bug (https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=d...@spamassassin.apache.org&q=subject:%22%5C%5BBug+%5C%5D+askdns+problem+with+multi%5C-valued+resource+records%22&o=newest) related to not using mult

Re: Askdns problem ?

volved or what. I've seen a bug (https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=d...@spamassassin.apache.org&q=subject:%22%5C%5BBug+%5C%5D+askdns+problem+with+multi%5C-valued+resource+records%22&o=newest) related to not using multiple RRs values, but that seems not present on 3.4.6. -Ca

Re: Askdns problem ?

o BZ after some cleanup. Paul On Fri, 16 Sept 2022 at 22:05, Carlos G Mendioroz via users < users@spamassassin.apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > I'm facing a problem with SA, that seems to be related to askdns. > > Mail server on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, spamassassin 3.4.6 via exim4. Lo

Askdns problem ?

Hi, I'm facing a problem with SA, that seems to be related to askdns. Mail server on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, spamassassin 3.4.6 via exim4. Local bind9 DNS server. Mail received from webex.com does not get SPF checked, which in turn triggers a local rule: meta DMARK_REJECT !(DKIM_VAL

RE: Lint problem with KAM.cf

It lints fine now Rick _ From: Kevin A. McGrail [mailto:kmcgr...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2021 5:43 PM To: SA Mailing list Subject: Re: Lint problem with KAM.cf I published a fix for the KAM SHORT A few hours ago. Please let me know how it's working for you

Re: Lint problem with KAM.cf

I published a fix for the KAM SHORT A few hours ago. Please let me know how it's working for you. On Tue, Aug 31, 2021, 23:48 Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > On 8/31/2021 12:57 PM, Jared Hall wrote: > > 2) OTOH, what's the point of sa-update doing versioning if nobody uses > it? > > It's there to su

Re: Lint problem with KAM.cf

On 8/31/2021 12:57 PM, Jared Hall wrote: 2) OTOH, what's the point of sa-update doing versioning if nobody uses it? It's there to support different rulesets but the project as a whole found it better to do more complicated things when rules proved incompatible to encapsulate them in has(cap

Re: Lint problem with KAM.cf

Rick Cooper wrote: It would appear you are using the SA git trunk version of the plugin (Andrew Colin Kissa informed me of the existence) which changes a LOT of the api. Near as I can tell the old module will work with your rules by adding the following at about line 489 of the DecodeShortURLs.

RE: Lint problem with KAM.cf

Cooper Cc: SA Mailing list Subject: Re: Lint problem with KAM.cf We will take a look. We check with lint for every publication but maybe there's a condition we missed or a spelling issue. Thanks for bringing it up. KAM On Mon, Aug 30, 2021, 15:31 Rick Cooper wrote: This have been going

Re: Lint problem with KAM.cf

Hi There is a new DecodeShortURLs in Spamassassin trunk, the API has changed from the one in the original module on GitHub. The new builtin module has the short_url function but the original module uses short_url_tests, the original module does not have a short_url function thus the error generat

Re: Lint problem with KAM.cf

+1 Same issue here. On 8/30/21 14:31, Rick Cooper wrote: > This have been going on a while but I haven't had time to addresses. > When the KAM rules are updated I see the following lint warning > warn: rules: error: unknown eval 'short_url' for __KAM_SHORT > > Near as I can tell I am running th

Re: Lint problem with KAM.cf

We will take a look. We check with lint for every publication but maybe there's a condition we missed or a spelling issue. Thanks for bringing it up. KAM On Mon, Aug 30, 2021, 15:31 Rick Cooper wrote: > This have been going on a while but I haven't had time to addresses. > When the KAM rules a

Lint problem with KAM.cf

This have been going on a while but I haven't had time to addresses. When the KAM rules are updated I see the following lint warning warn: rules: error: unknown eval 'short_url' for __KAM_SHORT Near as I can tell I am running the latest DecodeShortURLs.pm but the site says it's being merged direc

Re: Problem installing sa on my pi 3b+

On Fri, 9 Apr 2021, spamassas...@mach2.franken.de wrote: Am 07.04.2021 um 12:27 schrieb Antony Stone: I am running said packet install from an internet tutorial. Who wrote that tutorial and where does it point you to get the packages from? Antony. Hmm, it says execute the following comm

Re: Problem installing sa on my pi 3b+

Am 07.04.2021 um 12:27 schrieb Antony Stone: I am running said packet install from an internet tutorial. Who wrote that tutorial and where does it point you to get the packages from? Antony. Hmm, it says execute the following commands:     sudo apt-get update     sudo apt-get install spam

Re: Problem installing sa on my pi 3b+

On Wednesday 07 April 2021 at 12:05:42, spamassas...@mach2.franken.de wrote: > Ok so it seems I cant do anything to get it running on my side. > Funny enough that I use the official raspian which I kept up to date > with 'sudo apt-get update' > and now the 'sudo apt-get install that claims to use

Re: Problem installing sa on my pi 3b+

Ok so it seems I cant do anything to get it running on my side. Funny enough that I use the official raspian which I kept up to date with 'sudo apt-get update' and now the 'sudo apt-get install that claims to use the newest version (3.4.2-1+deb10u3) keeps running into such an error. How to find

Re: Problem installing sa on my pi 3b+

On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 03:29:12 +0200 Christian Tasler wrote: > Ok, maybe I'll need more than just a hint as I understood mostly > nothing. I am running said packet install from an internet tutorial. > I cannot do anything between issuing that command and the printout of > the error. So how am I suppo

Re: Problem installing sa on my pi 3b+

On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 02:27:46 +0200 spamassas...@mach2.franken.de wrote: > Hi there, > > when running a 'sudo apt-get install spamassassin' on my raspian pi > 3b+ i keep running into a problem with sa-compile: > ... > Can anyone give me a hint what to do? Using com

Problem installing sa on my pi 3b+

Hi there, when running a 'sudo apt-get install spamassassin' on my raspian pi 3b+ i keep running into a problem with sa-compile: sa-compile (3.4.2-1+deb10u3) wird eingerichtet ... Running sa-compile (may take a long time) In file included from /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/perl

Re: Problem with local.cf rules

On 2021-03-17 03:58, Peter West wrote: Seconded. The keywords here are "local, caching, *NON-FORWARDING* DNS server for SpamAssassin". URIBL_BLOCKED is not data from sorbs in bind9 its needed to add qname-minimization disabled; into options section if this is not added it breaks uribl and

URIBL_BLOCKED (was: Re: Problem with local.cf rules)

On Wed, 17 Mar 2021, Peter West wrote: The most pertinent stuff I found was this this Confluence page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/CachingNameserver So it looks as though I have to install a primary nameserver and a secondary rbldnsd. I’m trying to translate this

Re: Problem with local.cf rules

The most pertinent stuff I found was this this Confluence page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/CachingNameserver So it looks as though I have to install a primary nameserver and a secondary rbl

Re: Problem with local.cf rules

John Hardin writes: > From: John Hardin > Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 08:29:01 -0700 (PDT) > > On Sun, 14 Mar 2021, jwmi...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Peter West writes: > > > > And You might want to fix the URIBL_BLOCKED issue. Fixing the > > URIBL_BLOCKED issue will do far more to fix your is

Re: Problem with local.cf rules

On Sun, 14 Mar 2021, jwmi...@gmail.com wrote: Peter West writes: And You might want to fix the URIBL_BLOCKED issue. Fixing the URIBL_BLOCKED issue will do far more to fix your issues than adding rules. Seconded. The keywords here are "local, caching, *NON-FORWARDING* DNS server for SpamAssa

Re: Problem with local.cf rules

On Mon, 15 Mar 2021, Peter West wrote: Well, that was simple. Thank you. What’s the default value of a rule? Does it have one? The default score for all rules is 1 point. -- John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ jhar...@impsec.org pg

Re: Problem with local.cf rules

Peter West writes: > From: Peter West > Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 23:30:03 +1000 > > I m running spamassassin 3.4.2-0 in ubuntu 18.04.4. > > Controlling process is > /usr/bin/perl -T -w /usr/sbin/spamd -d --pidfile=/var/run/spamd.pid > --create-prefs --max-children 5 --helper-home-dir >

Re: Problem with local.cf rules

Well, that was simple. Thank you. What’s the default value of a rule? Does it have one? — p...@ehealth.id.au “Two men went up into the temple to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector.” > On 14 Mar 2021, at 11:41 pm, Alex Woick wrote: > > Peter West schrieb am 14.03.2021 um 14:30:

Re: Problem with local.cf rules

Peter West schrieb am 14.03.2021 um 14:30: header CASINO From =~ /\bcasino\b/i score 100.0 === It’s hitting the CASINO rule, but no matter what valoue I assign to the casino rules - 5, 20 , 100, these messages always come through with a value of 4.1. It’s as though some toerh rule is res

Problem with local.cf rules

I’m running spamassassin 3.4.2-0 in ubuntu 18.04.4. Controlling process is /usr/bin/perl -T -w /usr/sbin/spamd -d --pidfile=/var/run/spamd.pid --create-prefs --max-children 5 --helper-home-dir My local.cf has local rules enabled, and contains, inter alia, these rules = header CASINO Fr

Re: Problem with matching regex against long body

I > managed to find, but after digging into the source I found the > chunking logic and dug out the 2K limit. I'm not sure why I was > hitting a limit at just under 1K, I can only guess that the header > was included in the first rawbody chunk, which seems a little > unlikely. The problem is that in general the "

Re: Problem with matching regex against long body

You may also want to stick optional whitespace in there to avoid trivial bypass: There's also the possibility of adding a typeface or other options to the tag, which would bypass your simple rule. And HTML is not case-sensitive. And avoid * on complex stuff when matching arbitrarily long texts

Re: Problem with matching regex against long body

On Tue, 3 Nov 2020, Loren Wilton wrote: I'm getting lots of spams that are about 100+K long. The spam body contains two blocks of random news text copied from fox news or msnbc or the like, enclosed in a zero-point font block. I'm trying to match this simple pattern to give some extra points,

Re: Problem with matching regex against long body

See rawbody_part_scan is the docs. Also the chunking of the rawbody into 2-4 kB blocks, may make a difference. I wasn't able to find rawbody_part_scan in any of the docs that I managed to find, but after digging into the source I found the chunking logic and dug out the 2K limit. I'm not su

Re: Problem with matching regex against long body

On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 20:09:46 + RW wrote: > On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 10:32:41 -0800 > Loren Wilton wrote: > > > I'm getting lots of spams that are about 100+K long. The spam body > > contains two blocks of random news text copied from fox news or > > msnbc or the like, enclosed in a zero-point font b

Re: Problem with matching regex against long body

On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 10:32:41 -0800 Loren Wilton wrote: > I'm getting lots of spams that are about 100+K long. The spam body > contains two blocks of random news text copied from fox news or msnbc > or the like, enclosed in a zero-point font block. I'm trying to match > this simple pattern to give s

Re: Problem with matching regex against long body

basics of escaping at least *anything* won't do any harm php > echo preg_quote('[^<]*<'); \\[\^\<\]\*\< Well, escaping the [^<]* part certianly will do harm, since it will turn it from a group match into individual characters that don't exist in the text to be matched. But I've tried escapi

Problem with matching regex against long body

I'm getting lots of spams that are about 100+K long. The spam body contains two blocks of random news text copied from fox news or msnbc or the like, enclosed in a zero-point font block. I'm trying to match this simple pattern to give some extra points, but I can't seem to get it to work. I'm wo

Re: Problem with SpamAssassin rules wiki. What is the new link ?

On 9 Apr 2020, at 5:12, Antoine Chiris wrote: Dear SpamAssassin users/team, I have a little problem with *SpamAssassin*. I don't find the documentation for the rules. The definitive documentation of the rules that are distributed as part of the project is the rules files themselves.

Problem with SpamAssassin rules wiki. What is the new link ?

Dear SpamAssassin users/team, I have a little problem with *SpamAssassin*. I don't find the documentation for the rules. For example, for the rule MIME_HTML_MOSTLY I have a link to this wiki : https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Rules/MIME_HTML_MOSTLY But apparently the documentation

Re: Building problem with 3.4.4

Sorry; third machine is openSuSE but old 11.4; second machine was opensSuSE 13.1 Peraps the perl is too old... On Thu, 30 Jan 2020, Henrik K wrote: On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 04:49:37PM +, John wrote: i have built 3.4.4 from sources on three different computers. The first two worked OK an

Re: Building problem with 3.4.4

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 04:49:37PM +, John wrote: > i have built 3.4.4 from sources on three different computers. The > first two worked OK and the new system is in service (A Debian and a > openSuSE system). However on the third machine I have a range f > problems I do not understand. Would

Building problem with 3.4.4

i have built 3.4.4 from sources on three different computers. The first two worked OK and the new system is in service (A Debian and a openSuSE system). However on the third machine I have a range f problems I do not understand. First it noted a number of missing optional perk modules which limi

Re: Problem with spamassassin update at /usr/bin/sa-update line 1603

On 2/22/2019 5:36 AM, mbaldov wrote: > So I ask you if it's possible to intervene on the mirror's list with > some option so that to exclude the bad mirrors. Escalating that issue to our sysadmins list.  Thanks for reporting the problem. -- Kevin A. McGrail Member, Apache Sof

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >