June 21, 2023 12:59 PM, "Matija Nalis" <mnalis-sa-l...@voyager.hr> wrote:
> Another way to prove that the problem is exclusively in spamassassin > is to reproduce the problem ONLY with spamassassin (i.e. without > dovecot, amavisd, etc. being involved at all) - e.g. by manually > running "spamassassin -t /tmp/blah.mbox" and showing that it creates > and leaves behind some temporary files. Fully agree with that. More importantly, when one uses Amabosd-new with Spamassassin, there is no spamassassin running, Amavisd-new loads the SA lib and uses the code. So may be there is a mismatch between Amavisd-new and the new code of SA 4.x. patpro
