Re: Particularly annoying spam

2015-05-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
On 2015-05-02 15:40, John Hardin wrote: On Fri, 1 May 2015, RW wrote: On Fri, 01 May 2015 09:55:31 -0500 Larry Rosenman wrote: X-Spam-Report: SpamScore (3.8/5.0) BAYES_99=3.5,BAYES_999=0.2 Consider increasing the score of BAYES_99 above 5. For me BAYES_99 has an FP rate that's negligible

Re: Particularly annoying spam

2015-05-02 Thread John Hardin
On Fri, 1 May 2015, RW wrote: On Fri, 01 May 2015 09:55:31 -0500 Larry Rosenman wrote: X-Spam-Report: SpamScore (3.8/5.0) BAYES_99=3.5,BAYES_999=0.2 Consider increasing the score of BAYES_99 above 5. For me BAYES_99 has an FP rate that's negligible compared with the FP rate of spamassassin

Re: Particularly annoying spam

2015-05-02 Thread RW
On Fri, 01 May 2015 09:55:31 -0500 Larry Rosenman wrote: > http://pastebin.com/4gck7uLD > > This one and one's like it seem to get through multiple times/day. > > Any help here? Today's is WITH 3.4.1.. > > X-Spam-Report: SpamScore (3.8/5.0) BAYES_99=3.5,BAYES_999=0.2 Consider increasing t

Re: Particularly annoying spam

2015-05-02 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Am 01.05.2015 um 16:55 schrieb Larry Rosenman: http://pastebin.com/4gck7uLD This one and one's like it seem to get through multiple times/day. Any help here? Today's is WITH 3.4.1.. On 01.05.15 17:11, Reindl Harald wrote: Content analysis details: (14.9 points, 5.5 required) pts rule

Re: Particularly annoying spam

2015-05-02 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 01.05.2015 um 20:22 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: On 01.05.15 11:17, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Reindl's test showed it is hitting URIBL and it looks like it's also a good candidate for raising your SPF score and Bayesian training. I wouldn't say so... for getting standard required_score 5

Re: Particularly annoying spam

2015-05-02 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 01.05.15 11:17, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Reindl's test showed it is hitting URIBL and it looks like it's also a good candidate for raising your SPF score and Bayesian training. I wouldn't say so... for getting standard required_score 5.0 is standard 1.7 points for URIBL_BLACK and standard 3.5

Re: Particularly annoying spam

2015-05-01 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 5/1/2015 11:14 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote: The rule it will hit on is KAM_SALEA. Beat me to it. I was just adding the domain to the RBL as well. Thanks, Guys! I have a cronjob running every 6 hours (but I ran it early to get this one). Which RBL did you add it to, KAM? PCCC's RBL which is

Re: Particularly annoying spam

2015-05-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
On 2015-05-01 10:08, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 5/1/2015 11:06 AM, Joe Quinn wrote: On 5/1/2015 10:55 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote: http://pastebin.com/4gck7uLD This one and one's like it seem to get through multiple times/day. Any help here? Today's is WITH 3.4.1.. That's a variant on a pr

Re: Particularly annoying spam

2015-05-01 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 01.05.2015 um 16:55 schrieb Larry Rosenman: http://pastebin.com/4gck7uLD This one and one's like it seem to get through multiple times/day. Any help here? Today's is WITH 3.4.1.. Content analysis details: (14.9 points, 5.5 required) pts rule name description --

Re: Particularly annoying spam

2015-05-01 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 5/1/2015 11:06 AM, Joe Quinn wrote: On 5/1/2015 10:55 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote: http://pastebin.com/4gck7uLD This one and one's like it seem to get through multiple times/day. Any help here? Today's is WITH 3.4.1.. That's a variant on a pretty old campaign that I haven't seen get thr

Re: Particularly annoying spam

2015-05-01 Thread Joe Quinn
On 5/1/2015 10:55 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote: http://pastebin.com/4gck7uLD This one and one's like it seem to get through multiple times/day. Any help here? Today's is WITH 3.4.1.. That's a variant on a pretty old campaign that I haven't seen get through in a long while. I've updated KAM

Re: Particularly annoying spam

2015-05-01 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 5/1/2015 10:55 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote: http://pastebin.com/4gck7uLD This one and one's like it seem to get through multiple times/day. Any help here? Today's is WITH 3.4.1.. Haven't seen this spam but I ran it through our test box. Doesn't look like it hits much except the Invaluem

Particularly annoying spam

2015-05-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
http://pastebin.com/4gck7uLD This one and one's like it seem to get through multiple times/day. Any help here? Today's is WITH 3.4.1.. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail: 108 Turvey Cove, H