On 2015-05-02 15:40, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 1 May 2015, RW wrote:

On Fri, 01 May 2015 09:55:31 -0500
Larry Rosenman wrote:

X-Spam-Report: SpamScore (3.8/5.0) BAYES_99=3.5,BAYES_999=0.2

Consider increasing the score of BAYES_99 above 5. For me BAYES_99 has
an FP rate that's negligible compared with the FP rate of spamassassin
itself.

...and if you don't want to bump BAYES_99 that much, bump BAYES_999 -
it's a little bit safer.
I wound up turning on SHORTCIRCUIT for BAYES_99 and BAYES_00. and a couple of
other tweaks.  So far my mailbox has been blissfully clean :)

Thanks guys!
--
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 214-642-9640                 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org
US Mail: 108 Turvey Cove, Hutto, TX 78634-5688

Reply via email to