headers (assuming you
>> > > > get the report header that shows which rules hit).
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > John Hardin KA7OHZ
>> > > > http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic
>> > > >
That's what that setting does. By default, only spam emails have the
report, but if you put that line in your user_prefs file, then all
email will have the report.
Bowie
z3r0 wrote:
> Can I make all emails ham and spam have that report?
>
>
>
> Bowie Bailey wrote:
> >
> > Add the following l
PROTECTED] key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4
>> > 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
>> >
>> ---
>> > So Microsoft's invented the ASCII equivalent to ugly ink spots
>> > that appear on your letter when your pen is malfunct
Add the following line to your user_prefs so that it adds the report
to the email regardless of spam status.
add_header all Report _REPORT_
By default, only spam messages have the report.
Bowie
z3r0 wrote:
> I did but didn't see any of that in message header pressing ctrl F3
> in OE...
---------
> Today: The 4th anniversary of the loss of STS-107 Columbia
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Made-my-first-rule-but-is-not-checking-anything--Do-I-need-to-enable-that--tf3157041.html#a8769850
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, z3r0 wrote:
> >From my hosting admin:
> >>>
> You can add custom test rules to your user_prefs file in your home directory
> if you wish.
> >>>
Good...
> In case I want to add 3 rules just paste all that text in there and that's
> enough?
Just to confirm that works, try putt
ovide your service provider with samples of the spam and ask
>>them to do something about it.
>>
>>
>>Daryl
>
>
> The voice of reason.
>
> Maybe you could run fetchmail locally and then you'd control your own
> SA. Forward any spam you get to your ISP's abuse address?
>
> KR
>
> Nigel
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Made-my-first-rule-but-is-not-checking-anything--Do-I-need-to-enable-that--tf3157041.html#a8759215
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, z3r0 wrote:
> "rules that would kill system performance"
> I suppoused rules were nice and good, no time-bombs.
A hosting provider can't make the assumption that all their customers
will play nice (or, for that matter, are competent).
> So any chances for me or I must forget
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 18:34:09 -0500, "Daryl C. W. O'Shea"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>z3r0 wrote:
>> "rules that would kill system performance"
>> I suppoused rules were nice and good, no time-bombs.
>
>I'm not sure what you're saying there.
>
>
>> So any chances for me or I must forget SA?
>
>That
z3r0 wrote:
"rules that would kill system performance"
I suppoused rules were nice and good, no time-bombs.
I'm not sure what you're saying there.
So any chances for me or I must forget SA?
That, of course, is up to you. If you've got a shell account that you
can run whatever you want on
ld kill system performance.
>
> Daryl
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Made-my-first-rule-but-is-not-checking-anything--Do-I-need-to-enable-that--tf3157041.html#a8758869
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
z3r0 wrote:
Asked my hosting about the issue. The response was:
"We do not allow clients to install custom SpamAssassin rules."
That's terrible. Why can't users decide what rules to use. I want a life
spam free...
Myself, I'd be afraid of a provider who did allow user rules. It's
trivial to
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, z3r0 wrote:
> Asked my hosting about the issue. The response was: "We do not
> allow clients to install custom SpamAssassin rules."
>
> That's terrible. Why can't users decide what rules to use. I want
> a life spam free...
A user could easily define a set of rules that would
>>>>>
>>
>>I expected there to appear something like: PALABRAS_MALAS_SUBJECT 1.1
>>
>>
>>My questions:
>>1) Is the rule ok?
>>2) Is it enough with uploading the .cf files to that folder in order to
>>work?
>>3) When a message come
n /etc/mail/spamassassin dir
I have nothing in etc/ but a folder with my domain name and inside a folder
with my account name.
But I understood that you can put rules there, with the disadvantage that if
upgrade comes, they will be lost.
About: restarting SA I can't do anything as a final hostin
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 08:05:12PM +, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
> ..and don't forget to restart spamassassin (also make sure you run
> --lint)
To note, one doesn't need to restart spamd when there's changes to the
user_prefs file. His issue is that unless spamd's specifically configured
to allow
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:59:30 -0800 (PST), z3r0
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I'm a common user, just have a hosting account and spamassassin 3.1.7
>enabled.
>The only directory in all my ftp folder that contains something related to
>SA is
>in root .spamassassin, where lives just 4 files, one of th
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, z3r0 wrote:
> >>>
> header PALABRAS_MALAS_SUBJECT Subject =~ /\belefantes|ilegales|africanos\b
> describe PALABRAS_MALAS_SUBJECT Contiene palabras malas en el asunto
> score PALABRAS_MALAS_SUBJECT 1.1
> >>
>
> My questions:
> 1) Is the rule ok?
You probably want it to end wi
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:59:30AM -0800, z3r0 wrote:
> I'm a common user, just have a hosting account and spamassassin 3.1.7
> enabled.
> The only directory in all my ftp folder that contains something related to
> SA is
> in root .spamassassin, where lives just 4 files, one of these is user_prefs
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:59:30 -0800 (PST), z3r0
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I'm a common user, just have a hosting account and spamassassin 3.1.7
>enabled.
>The only directory in all my ftp folder that contains something related to
>SA is
>in root .spamassassin, where lives just 4 files, one of th
What is going on?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Made-my-first-rule-but-is-not-checking-anything--Do-I-need-to-enable-that--tf3157041.html#a8755192
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
At 08:04 PM 5/2/2005, jdow wrote:
Either a format change has happened or the above rule has no chance
of working.
A more proper format for the first line, even if the rest is left
the original way, would be something like:
headerSLOWHND67 From =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
If there is a "
From: "Joe Kletch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On May 2, 2005, at 4:39 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Joe Kletch wrote:
> >> So excited--I created my first rule.
> >
> > Congratulations!
> >
> >> It ran through lint wit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Joe Kletch wrote:
>
>
>>So excited--I created my first rule.
>>
>>
>
>Congratulations!
>
>
>
>>It ran through lint with no
>>errors and seems to be achieving the requested outcome: move messages
>>from
On May 2, 2005, at 4:39 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joe Kletch wrote:
So excited--I created my first rule.
Congratulations!
It ran through lint with no
errors and seems to be achieving the requested outcome: move messages
from this sender to the recipients Spam folder, but do not reject (
Joe Kletch wrote:
> So excited--I created my first rule.
Congratulations!
> It ran through lint with no
> errors and seems to be achieving the requested outcome: move messages
> from this sender to the recipients Spam folder, but do not reject (I
> have simscan rejecting scores
So excited--I created my first rule. It ran through lint with no errors
and seems to be achieving the requested outcome: move messages from
this sender to the recipients Spam folder, but do not reject (I have
simscan rejecting scores over 18 points). The Threshold for moving to
the Spam folder
27 matches
Mail list logo
