I have found SaneSecurity definitions to be VERY good - they hit about 60% of
my SPAM which is incredible given that they only match exact results (they
are not fuzzy). However this high percentage may be beacuse I am based in
the UK as is the author of the sanesecurity definitions. Also they tend
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Matthias Keller wrote:
> I'm only using the signatures with the spamassassin plugin because I found
> them to be too invasive. I dont allow anyone to block a mail at SMTP level
> just because it contains ONE sentence. The sanesecurity signatures also
> contain a LOT of single
Andy Dills wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
Guys
These are NOT AV signatures to be updated every day/hour, whatever
Hammering the site won't make it any better and not help to keep it going.
Seems some ppl still haven't understood that hammer-leeching spoils it for
eve
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
> Guys
>
> These are NOT AV signatures to be updated every day/hour, whatever
>
> Hammering the site won't make it any better and not help to keep it going.
>
> Seems some ppl still haven't understood that hammer-leeching spoils it for
> everyone an
Guys
These are NOT AV signatures to be updated every day/hour, whatever
Hammering the site won't make it any better and not help to keep it going.
Seems some ppl still haven't understood that hammer-leeching spoils it
for everyone and themselves.
Igor Chudov wrote:
> #!/bin/bash
Since there are no bash specific features this could be a standard
/bin/sh just as easily and then does not depend upon bash.
> PM=`perl -MConfig -e 'print
> "$Config{installsitelib}"'`/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/PDFInfo.pm
> CF=/etc/mail/spamassassin/PDFInfo.cf
>
#!/bin/bash
PM=`perl -MConfig -e 'print
"$Config{installsitelib}"'`/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/PDFInfo.pm
CF=/etc/mail/spamassassin/PDFInfo.cf
cp $PM $PM.bak || exit 1 # Probably I am not root...
cp $CF $CF.bak || exit 1 # same
echo Downloading, veryfying perl module and size of config file...
