Re: Mismarked Ham

2009-10-15 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> > What makes you think any of the rules are incorrect? A score of 6.1 is not > > 100% (or even 99%, IIRC) spam. On 14.10.09 22:40, MySQL Student wrote: > Incorrect in that at least one of the rules fired when they should not > have, making the valid email to be marked as spam. Or maybe they did

Re: Mismarked Ham

2009-10-15 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> On 14-Oct-2009, at 19:40, MySQL Student wrote: >> Which rule(s) is then incorrect? What is the right solution here? Is >> the only option to whitelist the user? On 14.10.09 19:54, LuKreme wrote: > What makes you think any of the rules are incorrect? A score of 6.1 is > not 100% (or even 99%, I

Re: Mismarked Ham

2009-10-14 Thread MySQL Student
Hi, >> I'm not sure which of those scored what. [...] > > Seconded. I do see quite a few custom rules. How much did they score? My apologies; I hadn't realized so much of it was non-standard. It's otherwise obviously not very possible to help without knowing what the rules are for if you haven't

Re: Mismarked Ham

2009-10-14 Thread MySQL Student
Hi, > What makes you think any of the rules are incorrect? A score of 6.1 is not > 100% (or even 99%, IIRC) spam. Incorrect in that at least one of the rules fired when they should not have, making the valid email to be marked as spam. > there's a couple of things here. > > First, for some reaso

Re: Mismarked Ham

2009-10-14 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 19:54 -0600, LuKreme wrote: > On 14-Oct-2009, at 19:40, MySQL Student wrote: > > Which rule(s) is then incorrect? What is the right solution here? Is > > the only option to whitelist the user? > your spam test were: > > X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.1 tag1=-300.0 tag2=5.0 kill=

Re: Mismarked Ham

2009-10-14 Thread LuKreme
On 14-Oct-2009, at 19:40, MySQL Student wrote: Which rule(s) is then incorrect? What is the right solution here? Is the only option to whitelist the user? What makes you think any of the rules are incorrect? A score of 6.1 is not 100% (or even 99%, IIRC) spam. your spam test were: X-Spam-

Mismarked Ham

2009-10-14 Thread MySQL Student
Hi, I thought I would look through the quarantine for "BAYES_00" to see if there were any mis-marked messages or if bayes was not firing correctly, and I have found a few, although not how I expected it would be. Instead of finding BAYES_00 in spam, I've found it in ham that was pushed over the t