> On 14-Oct-2009, at 19:40, MySQL Student wrote: >> Which rule(s) is then incorrect? What is the right solution here? Is >> the only option to whitelist the user?
On 14.10.09 19:54, LuKreme wrote: > What makes you think any of the rules are incorrect? A score of 6.1 is > not 100% (or even 99%, IIRC) spam. > > your spam test were: > > X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.1 tag1=-300.0 tag2=5.0 kill=5.0 > use_bayes=1 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, EXTRA_MPART_TYPE, > FREEMAIL_FROM, > HTML_MESSAGE, L_UNVERIFIED_GMAIL, PART_CID_STOCK, RELAYCOUNTRY_HIGH, > RELAYCOUNTRY_US, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_NAME_LONG, > T_TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID1 > > there's a couple of things here. > > First, for some reason you have DKIM_SIGNED but not DKIM_VERIFIED, which > seems odd as this looks like a legit gmail message with a legit DKIM > signature. So there's one thing to check. I think there was problem with the DKIM package in the past, resulting to exactly this problem. OP should upgrade his Mail::DKIM module. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Fighting for peace is like fucking for virginity...
