Sorry bubbie, send me a challenge and you go into the evil list, which
tends to be a permanent /dev/null redirect. This is iron clad on a
mailing list. Direct I may or may not consign. C/R is plain evil as I
have encountered it in the past. On mailing lists it's beyond evil as
it generates challen
On Sat, 4 Dec 2010 16:08:36 +
RW wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 12:44:37 +0100
> Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
>
>
> > C/R is only means to make it move your own effort over to others.
> >
> > The really "interesting" case is if both sides choose to require C/R
> > to get the first mail delivere
On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 12:44:37 +0100
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> C/R is only means to make it move your own effort over to others.
>
> The really "interesting" case is if both sides choose to require C/R
> to get the first mail delivered.
> Which should be a clear sign to everyone that C/R is basi
On Mit, 2010-12-01 at 16:17 -0500, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:02:03 -0500
> Michael Grant wrote:
>
> > The main problem with this approach is how does
> > someone send you mail if they're not on your contact list? I don't
> > have any magic answers how to solve that beyond wh
On 12/1/10 10:37 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 20:38 -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 12/1/10 7:02 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Personally, I have *never* received a legit C/R. Every single one that
ended up on my machines have been in response to spam sent with a for
Le 02/12/2010 11:47, Martin Gregorie a écrit :
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 08:28 +0100, John Wilcock wrote:
I wish I could say the same - at work we have at least a dozen clients
who use challenge/response, and when it's for business you can't just
ignore the challenges, let alone blacklist your clien
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 08:28 +0100, John Wilcock wrote:
> I wish I could say the same - at work we have at least a dozen clients
> who use challenge/response, and when it's for business you can't just
> ignore the challenges, let alone blacklist your clients.
>
It seems to me that if a business o
Karsten Bräckelmann schrieb:
> Personally, I have *never* received a legit C/R. Every single one that
> ended up on my machines have been in response to spam sent with a forged
> sender address.
I see some C/R when machines are stuck talking to each other :(
Someone signs up for a newsletter, or o
Le 02/12/2010 01:02, Karsten Bräckelmann a écrit :
Personally, I have *never* received a legit C/R. Every single one that
ended up on my machines have been in response to spam sent with a forged
sender address.
I wish I could say the same - at work we have at least a dozen clients
who use chal
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 20:38 -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> On 12/1/10 7:02 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > Personally, I have *never* received a legit C/R. Every single one that
> > ended up on my machines have been in response to spam sent with a forged
> > sender address.
>
> I had a legit
On 12/1/10 7:02 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Personally, I have*never* received a legit C/R. Every single one that
ended up on my machines have been in response to spam sent with a forged
sender address.
I had a legit one.
I was stupid enough to answer a question on this list directly to a
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 16:17 -0500, David F. Skoll wrote:
> Challenge-Response systems are evil. I never reply to challenges and I
> typically blacklist systems that send them.
Personally, I have *never* received a legit C/R. Every single one that
ended up on my machines have been in response to s
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:02:03 -0500
Michael Grant wrote:
> The main problem with this approach is how does
> someone send you mail if they're not on your contact list? I don't
> have any magic answers how to solve that beyond what's already out
> there as in return messages with captchas in them o
13 matches
Mail list logo
