Paul Wetter wrote:
Ok, I added what you said. I think things may be back on the up and in
operation. Some spam however is still not detected, which brings me to
my next question.
I have one other question about razor checks. They do not appear to be
working. If I do a manual check (with the
Paul Wetter wrote:
> Ok, I added what you said. I think things may be back on the up and in
> operation. Some spam however is still not detected, which brings me to
> my next question.
>
> I have one other question about razor checks. They do not appear to be
> working. If I do a manual check
Paul Wetter wrote:
Ok, I added what you said. I think things may be back on the up and in
operation. Some spam however is still not detected, which brings me to
my next question.
I have one other question about razor checks. They do not appear to be
working. If I do a manual check (with t
ttler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: Messages Not detected as Spam
Paul Wetter wrote:
To answer your questions:
1. I ran spamassassin -t as root.
amavis runs as a different user.
I do have bayes_path in the local.cf file. The
ttler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul Wetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: Messages Not detected as Spam
Paul Wetter wrote:
To answer your questions:
1. I ran spa
On 24-Apr-06, at 9:25 PM, Paul Wetter wrote:
Here is what I get when I reproduce the email:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.002 tagged_above=-1 required=1.5
tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
spamassassin -t gives me this:
Content analysis details: (9.1 points, 2.5 required)
pts rule name
Paul Wetter wrote:
>>
>>
>>
> To answer your questions:
> 1. I ran spamassassin -t as root.
> amavis runs as a different user.
> I do have bayes_path in the local.cf file. The line should read as
> follows correct?
> bayes_path /firstpartofpath/.spamassassin/bayes
Yes. If /firstpartofpath/ doesn
> Paul Wetter wrote:
>> Here is what I get when I reproduce the email:
>> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.002 tagged_above=-1 required=1.5
>> tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
>>
>>
>> spamassassin -t gives me this:
>>
>> Content analysis details: (9.1 points, 2.5 required)
>>
>> pts rule name
Paul Wetter wrote:
> Here is what I get when I reproduce the email:
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.002 tagged_above=-1 required=1.5
> tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
>
>
> spamassassin -t gives me this:
>
> Content analysis details: (9.1 points, 2.5 required)
>
> pts rule name
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 10:46 PM
Subject: Re: Messages Not detected as Spam
Paul Wetter wrote:
For the last week now I have been receiving several very similar
messages that are spam and not being detected as spam. I have done an
sa-learn on every one of them but they still come in not
Paul Wetter wrote:
> For the last week now I have been receiving several very similar
> messages that are spam and not being detected as spam. I have done an
> sa-learn on every one of them but they still come in not even being
> tagged. Is there something wrong with my bayes detection? Is there
detected as
Spam
For the last week now I have been receiving
several very similar messages that are spam and not being detected as
spam. I have done an sa-learn on every one of them but they still come
in not even being tagged. Is there something wrong with my bayes
detection
For the last week now I have been receiving
several very similar messages that are spam and not being detected as
spam. I have done an sa-learn on every one of them but they still come in
not even being tagged. Is there something wrong with my bayes
detection? Is there any way to log wha
13 matches
Mail list logo
