RE: SARE_FRAUD vs SURBLs (Was: RE: Mass-check errors)

2004-09-09 Thread Smart,Dan
> -Original Message- > From: Smart,Dan > To: Chris Santerre; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: SARE_FRAUD vs SURBLs (Was: RE: Mass-check errors) > > I then did a > Perl -d:Dprof /usr/bin/spamassassin < testfile And then ran > the profiler as descri

RE: SARE_FRAUD vs SURBLs (Was: RE: Mass-check errors)

2004-09-09 Thread Smart,Dan
PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 10:27 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: SARE_FRAUD vs SURBLs (Was: RE: Mass-check errors) > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Thurs

Re: SARE_FRAUD vs SURBLs (Was: RE: Mass-check errors)

2004-09-09 Thread Kelson
Jeff Chan wrote: SARE_FRAUD has rules to catch text patterns in messages. It does not look for phishing URI domains and IP addresses. Therefore PH and SARE_FRAUD are not equivalent, and you may want to keep using the SARE rule, even if you are using PH in multi.surbl.org. More importantly, many o

RE: SARE_FRAUD vs SURBLs (Was: RE: Mass-check errors)

2004-09-09 Thread Chris Santerre
>-Original Message- >From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 3:07 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: SARE_FRAUD vs SURBLs (Was: RE: Mass-check errors) > > >On Wednesday, September 8, 2004, 7:12:26 AM, Smart,Dan Smart,Dan wr

SARE_FRAUD vs SURBLs (Was: RE: Mass-check errors)

2004-09-09 Thread Jeff Chan
On Wednesday, September 8, 2004, 7:12:26 AM, Smart,Dan Smart,Dan wrote: > What I found was that the Textcat language rules was main time-sink, > followed by the SARE_FRAUD ruleset. Since SURBL now has the PH list, I > removed the FRAUD ruleset too. Dan, SARE_FRAUD has rules to catch text patterns

RE: Mass-check errors

2004-09-08 Thread Smart,Dan
> -Original Message- > From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 7:12 PM > To: Smart,Dan > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Mass-check errors > TextCat looks for $rulesdir/languages, which via your above &g

Re: Mass-check errors

2004-09-08 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 04:50:17PM -0500, Smart,Dan wrote: > > Otherwise I would try explicitly running "mass-check -c > > /path/to/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.64/rules" > > I did point to my 2.64 rules, per... > ./mass-check -c=/etc/mail/spamassassin/ --progress --net --mbox > /var/spool/procmail/tem

Re: Mass-check errors

2004-09-08 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 05:19:58PM -0500, Smart,Dan wrote: > perl -d:DProf ./mass-check -c=/etc/mail/spamassassin/test --net --mbox > /var/spool/procmail/tempfail > > Segmentation fault > > Any suggestions? Yeah, that'd DProf... You can try rerunning it a few times, DProf is picky sometimes. I

RE: Mass-check errors

2004-09-07 Thread Smart,Dan
I took out the language options, and it runs standalone. With debug: perl -d:DProf ./mass-check -c=/etc/mail/spamassassin/test --net --mbox /var/spool/procmail/tempfail I get: Segmentation fault Any suggestions? <>

RE: Mass-check errors

2004-09-07 Thread Smart,Dan
> -Original Message- > From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 3:56 PM > To: Smart,Dan > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Mass-check errors > Hrm. In theory, it'll only happen if you specify ok_languages

Re: Mass-check errors

2004-09-07 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 03:27:25PM -0500, Smart,Dan wrote: > Use of uninitialized value in open at > /root/.cpan/build/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.64/masses/../lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Tex > tCat.pm line 63. > cannot open languages: No such file or directory > > What do I need to do to bypass this error. Hr

Mass-check errors

2004-09-07 Thread Smart,Dan
When I try to run mass-check on an MBOX file I get the following Use of uninitialized value in open at /root/.cpan/build/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.64/masses/../lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Tex tCat.pm line 63. cannot open languages: No such file or directory What do I need to do to bypass this error. I'm