Re: 3.1.6, local scores, and sa-update

2006-10-06 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Thu, October 5, 2006 21:38, John Andersen wrote: > I'm pretty sure this is going to be a major problem for many many sites. > Lots of people are running various specialized rules in separate .cf files. i did: mv /etc/mail/spamassassin ~/tmp mkdir -p /etc/mail/spamassassin sa-update cp ~/tmp /

Re: 3.1.6, local scores, and sa-update

2006-10-05 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: For now you'll have to disable the score lines while you do sa-update. Temporarily renaming whatever.cf to whatever.cf-disabled is probably the easiest way to go about it. BTW, you could also delete or comment out the "exit 2;" around line 375 of sa-update. Daryl

Re: 3.1.6, local scores, and sa-update

2006-10-05 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Stuart Johnston wrote: Could you just add appropriate ifplugin lines for a more permanent fix? Unfortunately, no. Everything in the local site config dir is loaded, including the pre files. The default rules aren't loaded though... a poor attempt at not bothering to lint rules that are nev

Re: 3.1.6, local scores, and sa-update

2006-10-05 Thread Stuart Johnston
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: Mike Grau wrote: Since upgrading to SpamAssassin 3.1.6, running sa-update yields # sa-update config: warning: score set for non-existent rule BAYES_50 config: warning: score set for non-existent rule BAYES_05 ... error: lint check of current site config failed, canno

Re: 3.1.6, local scores, and sa-update

2006-10-05 Thread John Andersen
On Thursday 05 October 2006 11:31, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > > Previously I've set some custom scores for stock rules in > > /etc/mail/spamassassin/whatever.cf > > without changing the rule definitions or descriptions. Can I not do this > > and need to define the "body BAYES_99" and "describe BAY

Re: 3.1.6, local scores, and sa-update

2006-10-05 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Mike Grau wrote: Since upgrading to SpamAssassin 3.1.6, running sa-update yields # sa-update config: warning: score set for non-existent rule BAYES_50 config: warning: score set for non-existent rule BAYES_05 ... error: lint check of current site config failed, cannot continue. I assume this

3.1.6, local scores, and sa-update

2006-10-05 Thread Mike Grau
Since upgrading to SpamAssassin 3.1.6, running sa-update yields # sa-update config: warning: score set for non-existent rule BAYES_50 config: warning: score set for non-existent rule BAYES_05 config: warning: score set for non-existent rule BAYES_00 config: warning: score set for non-existent rule

Re: Local scores

2005-04-08 Thread Matt Kettler
At 06:37 AM 4/8/2005, Jon Gerdes wrote: Could someone please explain this for me: Header from an e-mail I received: ¯-8<-- X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.6 required=5.6 tests=BAYES_40,DATE_IN_PAST_12_24, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET autolear

Re: Local scores

2005-04-08 Thread Jon Gerdes
ower the score. However I'd think that RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET should crank up the score by a good amount and more than compensate for bayes. Loren - Original Message - From: "Jon Gerdes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 3:37 AM Subject: Local scores

Re: Local scores

2005-04-08 Thread Loren Wilton
pril 08, 2005 3:37 AM Subject: Local scores > *** Before acting on this email or opening any attachment you are advised to read the disclaimer at the end of this email *** > > Could someone please explain this for me: > > Header from an e-mail I received: &

Local scores

2005-04-08 Thread Jon Gerdes
-- Note that I've scored up RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET to 5.0. I know that the other local scores work OK becuause I can sent GTUBE in for a pretty large score Cheers Jon Gerdes *** Disclaimer *** The information contained in this E-Mail and any subsequent correspondence may be subj