18.09.2014, 22:58, Bob Proulx kirjoitti:
> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>> haproxy is just a small app capable of working as a proxy for http
>> or plain tcp connections. HA.
> What are you using for the Bayes database on the distributed compute
> farm? (Just curious...)
>
> Bob
>
MySQL /MariaDB 5.5
On 09/18/2014 09:58 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
haproxy is just a small app capable of working as a proxy for http
or plain tcp connections. HA.
What are you using for the Bayes database on the distributed compute
farm? (Just curious...)
Redis, can't beat it in speed and c
Am 18.09.2014 um 21:58 schrieb Bob Proulx:
> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>> haproxy is just a small app capable of working as a proxy for http
>> or plain tcp connections. HA.
>
> What are you using for the Bayes database on the distributed compute
> farm? (Just curious...)
something like MySQL is
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> haproxy is just a small app capable of working as a proxy for http
> or plain tcp connections. HA.
What are you using for the Bayes database on the distributed compute
farm? (Just curious...)
Bob
18.09.2014, 20:15, Alex Regan kirjoitti:
>
>>> LVS
>>
>> Implemented haproxy. Took 3 minutes to install and configure ;)
>
> So that basically works the same way as LVS, where you set up one
> server to distribute the load across N number of spamassassin systems
> connected to it?
>
> If you set it
LVS
Implemented haproxy. Took 3 minutes to install and configure ;)
So that basically works the same way as LVS, where you set up one server
to distribute the load across N number of spamassassin systems connected
to it?
If you set it up in 3 minutes, how about tuning? Is it as flexible?
17.09.2014, 22:22, Axb kirjoitti:
> On 09/17/2014 09:10 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>> What kind of simple load balancers are you using? I have been using just
>> DNS multiple address but that does not work any more. Something a *bit*
>> more intelligent is needed.
>>
>
> LVS
>
>
Implemented hapro
17.09.2014, 22:22, Reindl Harald kirjoitti:
> Am 17.09.2014 um 21:10 schrieb Jari Fredriksson:
>> What kind of simple load balancers are you using? I have been using just
>> DNS multiple address but that does not work any more. Something a *bit*
>> more intelligent is needed
> have you considered h
On 09/17/2014 09:10 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
What kind of simple load balancers are you using? I have been using just
DNS multiple address but that does not work any more. Something a *bit*
more intelligent is needed.
LVS
Am 17.09.2014 um 21:10 schrieb Jari Fredriksson:
> What kind of simple load balancers are you using? I have been using just
> DNS multiple address but that does not work any more. Something a *bit*
> more intelligent is needed
have you considered how to reduce the amount making it
to SA at all? 3
What kind of simple load balancers are you using? I have been using just
DNS multiple address but that does not work any more. Something a *bit*
more intelligent is needed.
--
jarif.bit
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bump. :) Gary, please share how you do this! Thanks!
> > > How do you (make and) balance the calls to the AV servers? How do you
> > > (make
> > > and) balance the calls to the spamd machines? I am very interested in
> > > these
> > > details!
> >
> > We just call them in order case on the c
> >
> > How do you (make and) balance the calls to the AV servers? How do you
> > (make
> > and) balance the calls to the spamd machines? I am very interested in
> > these
> > details!
>
> We just call them in order case on the connection line. On two of the 4
> SMTP gateways we use node 1 as
>
> How do you (make and) balance the calls to the AV servers? How do you
> (make
> and) balance the calls to the spamd machines? I am very interested in
> these
> details!
We just call them in order case on the connection line. On two of the 4
SMTP gateways we use node 1 as the primary and
-Original Message-
> > From: email builder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 5:19 PM
> > To: Jason Frisvold
> > Cc: Gary W. Smith; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Load balancing spamd
> >
> >
> >
>
--- Charles Sprickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, email builder wrote:
>
> > Technically, this should be feasible with just plain DNS load balancing,
> but
> > in our current medium/low budget scenario, we don't have the rackspace to
> > have numerous boxes that are dedicat
, August 02, 2005 5:19 PM
> To: Jason Frisvold
> Cc: Gary W. Smith; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Load balancing spamd
>
>
>
> --- Jason Frisvold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 8/1/05, email builder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&g
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, email builder wrote:
Technically, this should be feasible with just plain DNS load balancing, but
in our current medium/low budget scenario, we don't have the rackspace to
have numerous boxes that are dedicated ONLY to SA/clam, thus our desire is to
figure out a way to *WEIGH
--- Jason Frisvold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/1/05, email builder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Even if I had forgotten the -A, I think I would have been seeing
> connection
> > refused notices, but right now, it just seems to time out. I'm pretty
> sure
> > this is a LVS question more
On 8/1/05, email builder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Even if I had forgotten the -A, I think I would have been seeing connection
> refused notices, but right now, it just seems to time out. I'm pretty sure
> this is a LVS question more than a spamc/d question, since I've no problems
> with the la
Thanks!
> > From: email builder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 2:43 PM
> > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> > Subject: Load balancing spamd
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am looking for advice on how to load balance spamd serv
2005 2:43 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Load balancing spamd
>
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for advice on how to load balance spamd servers. I
(think
> I)
> understand that the -d option used with -H for spamc will randomize
> multiple
> addresses from
Hi,
I am looking for advice on how to load balance spamd servers. I (think I)
understand that the -d option used with -H for spamc will randomize multiple
addresses from a DNS lookup of the given hostname (and still include failover
support???).
However, I am wanting to do weighted load bala
On Wednesday 10 November 2004 13:33 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am looking for some help finding a proxy/load balancer that will work
> with spamc->group of spamd machines
>
> Does anyone have any tips on what to use?
>
> I tried balance (http://www.inlab.de/balance.html) and pen
> (http://sia
At 01:33 PM 11/10/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for some help finding a proxy/load balancer that will work with
spamc->group of spamd machines
Does anyone have any tips on what to use?
May I ask why you don't want to do a DNS based load balancing and spamc -H?
Quite frankly, it sounds
I am looking for some help finding a proxy/load balancer that will work with
spamc->group of spamd machines
Does anyone have any tips on what to use?
I tried balance (http://www.inlab.de/balance.html) and pen (http://siag.nu/pen/)
both return identical results, spamc sending to machine directly
26 matches
Mail list logo
