Jon Armitage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I solved the problem by simply making my filter not bother passing the
> > message to spamc at all if it was over 200k.
>
> Yes, as I understand sa-exim, messages over 250K (the default in my case)
> should not be passed to SA. That's why I'm wondering w
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Ribbens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I solved the problem by simply making my filter not bother passing the
> message to spamc at all if it was over 200k.
>
Yes, as I understand sa-exim, messages over 250K (the default in my case)
should not be passed t
> From: Sietse van Zanen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 December 2006 14:54
> Subject: RE: Intermittent spamc error
> Don't think that that is a problem SA, because on my sendmail set-up it
works perfectly. Maybe a bug in the local_scan() > function?
Thanks, Sietse, I
Sietse van Zanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have found the related Exim message...
> >
> > 2006-12-19 11:47:02 1GwdM9-0006Pd-35 local_scan() function timed out -
> > message temporarily rejected (size 320896)
>
> > ... so maybe I've posted this to the wrong list. Sorry.
>
>Unfortuna
't hurt to post the same question to the exim mailing list.
-Sietse
From: Jon Armitage
Sent: Tue 19-Dec-06 14:32
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Intermittent spamc error
I have found the related Exim message...
2006-12-19 11:47:02 1GwdM9-0006Pd-35 local_scan() function time
I have found the related Exim message...
2006-12-19 11:47:02 1GwdM9-0006Pd-35 local_scan() function timed out -
message temporarily rejected (size 320896)
... so maybe I've posted this to the wrong list. Sorry.
Jon
I am running SpamAssassin 3.1.7 on a Sunfire V210 with Solaris 10. SA is
called from Exim via the sa-exim localscan patch. Nothing has changed since
I last upgraded Exim at the beginning of November.
Over the past couple of days, I have been seeing the following messages in
my logs from time to ti
