>> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:11:19PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Is there any documentation for the spamd client interface?
>> > MIMEDefang can talk to clamd.sock directly, using the commands in man
>> > clamd, rather than spawning `clamdscan` processes. I checked man
>> > spam
-Michael Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: -MichaelPS ignore the learn method for now, that's from something else I'mworking on. Hello Michael,how far is your engagement in enhance the learn method to spamc/spamd?As i stated here http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201 i wou
John Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1) make room for passing a reference to a message instead of the message
> itself, to reduce network latency when it is not necessary (for example,
> if the spamd chosen just happens to be on localhost (because it's part
> of a list of servers that are being
John Rudd wrote:
> As long as people are thinking about new implementations of
> spamc/spamd, I'd like to make a couple suggestions:
>
> 1) make room for passing a reference to a message instead of the message
> itself, to reduce network latency when it is not necessary (for
> example, if the spam
Michael Parker wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:11:19PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Is there any documentation for the spamd client interface?
> > MIMEDefang can talk to clamd.sock directly, using the commands in man
> > clamd, rather than spawning `clamdscan` processes. I checke
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:11:19PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Is there any documentation for the spamd client interface?
> MIMEDefang can talk to clamd.sock directly, using the commands in man
> clamd, rather than spawning `clamdscan` processes. I checked man
> spamd and man spamc but co
Docs for the spamd protocol are in the source tree.
Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.0/spamd/PROTOCOL
On Wednesday 06 October 2004 03:11 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm interested in restructuring my MIMEDefang/SpamAssassin setup.
> Currently each MIMEDefang slave carries around its own SpamAssassin obje
I'm interested in restructuring my MIMEDefang/SpamAssassin setup. Currently
each MIMEDefang slave carries around its own SpamAssassin object.
I want to use spamd instead.
I could use `spamc ...` inside mimedefang-filter but that could be
unnecessarily expensive in process startup costs etc.
Is
