John Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 1) make room for passing a reference to a message instead of the message > itself, to reduce network latency when it is not necessary (for example, > if the spamd chosen just happens to be on localhost (because it's part > of a list of servers that are being balanced), then you'll waste a lot > of time transfering the message through the socket, instead of just > transfering the path to the file that contains the message).
+1 sounds good (well, assuming the message is actually in a file) > 2) make room for using other tools in addition to spam assassin (for > example, running an external virus scanner), making spamc/spamd a > possible nice general purpose means of distributing the load for email > scanning (not just for spam marking type scanning) and even email > delivery. +0 might be good Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan ApacheCon! 13-17 November (3 SpamAssassin http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/ http://www.apachecon.com/ sessions & more)
