Re: How to get SLB type blocking

2005-12-13 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Jonathan Allen wrote on Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:40:43 +: > I'm only held on IO::Socket::SSL and IO::Socket::INET6 now You only need them for spamd ssl or inet6 connections. And your lint shouldn't bark about them. Only the configure should mention them as missing, that's all. Kai -- Kai Schä

Re: How to get SLB type blocking

2005-12-13 Thread Jonathan Allen
Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Jonathan Allen wrote on Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:00:42 +: > > > Any ideas about the Perl modules that don't load - Net::Ident for example > > Did you install it? I know it's a problem to install it via CPAN, AFAIR it > throws errors. Do you need it? It does indeed, and alth

Re: How to get SLB type blocking

2005-12-13 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Jonathan Allen wrote on Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:00:42 +: > Any ideas about the Perl modules that don't load - Net::Ident for example Did you install it? I know it's a problem to install it via CPAN, AFAIR it throws errors. Do you need it? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Co

Re: How to get SLB type blocking

2005-12-13 Thread Jonathan Allen
Matt Kettler wrote: > That looks like DNS is working, so your RBL checks should be working. > > Are you sure you're not seeing any messages hit RCVD_IN_XBL, RCVD_IN_SBL, > RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET, and the like? Since I adjusted the TrustPath issue (thanks to Daryl), I haven't had any incoming SPAM

Re: How to get SLB type blocking

2005-12-13 Thread Jonathan Allen
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > > Check out http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/TrustPath before Matt > beats you into submission. ;) That appears to have done the trick. I have defined my network and my ISP's delivery array as trusted and I got SPAMCOP and other RBL errors on a spam I had saved.

Re: How to get SLB type blocking

2005-12-13 Thread Matt Kettler
Jonathan Allen wrote: > Matt Kettler wrote: > >>Try adding a -D to that command line, you'll get general debugging, which >>should report on the state of the DNS modules, if it thinks DNS is working >>(based on doing some simple MX lookups), etc. > > > In the output I got: > > [18501] dbg: dns:

Re: How to get SLB type blocking

2005-12-13 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Jonathan Allen wrote: Matt Kettler wrote: Try adding a -D to that command line, you'll get general debugging, which should report on the state of the DNS modules, if it thinks DNS is working (based on doing some simple MX lookups), etc. In the output I got: [18501] dbg: dns: testing resolver

Re: How to get SLB type blocking

2005-12-13 Thread Jonathan Allen
Kai, > That doesn't mean it's not working. Then let me try and rephrase my remarks: > Check if you have any hits from SBL rules I am now getting no hits from any SBL rules whereas I was getting several hundred a day. This sort of email is now coming into the user email boxes. > SA doesn't do

Re: How to get SLB type blocking

2005-12-13 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Jonathan Allen wrote on Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:07:12 +: > I sure am getting a *lot* of spam > at the moment ... That doesn't mean it's not working. Check if you have any hits from SBL rules and if you don't have then check some IPs you think should be on one at that database. So far you have

Re: How to get SLB type blocking

2005-12-13 Thread Jonathan Allen
Matt Kettler wrote: > Try adding a -D to that command line, you'll get general debugging, which > should report on the state of the DNS modules, if it thinks DNS is working > (based on doing some simple MX lookups), etc. In the output I got: [18501] dbg: dns: testing resolver nameservers: 158.152

Re: How to get SLB type blocking

2005-12-12 Thread Matt Kettler
Jonathan Allen wrote: > > Is there a debug mode that I could see ? Just typing > >spamassassin -t < spamemail | more > > shows that those tests aren't cutting in. Try adding a -D to that command line, you'll get general debugging, which should report on the state of the DNS modules, if it

Re: How to get SLB type blocking

2005-12-12 Thread Jonathan Allen
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > > If you installed one of their RPMs I think that the > /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin config file will probably have included "-L" > in it, so if starting with their included rc script you'll only be using > local tests. If this is the case just remove the "-L" from t

Re: How to get SLB type blocking

2005-12-12 Thread Jonathan Allen
Matt Kettler wrote: > Jonathan Allen wrote: > > I used to have SA 3.1.0 working with the Spamcop and SBL-type checks > > working just fine on my old mail-server (RH6, don't ask) but its > > hardware died and I am now trying to get it reworking on a Fedora > > Core 2 machine. > > Install the Net::D

Re: How to get SLB type blocking

2005-12-12 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Matt Kettler wrote: Jonathan Allen wrote: I used to have SA 3.1.0 working with the Spamcop and SBL-type checks working just fine on my old mail-server (RH6, don't ask) but its hardware died and I am now trying to get it reworking on a Fedora Core 2 machine. Install the Net::DNS perl module.

Re: How to get SLB type blocking

2005-12-12 Thread Matt Kettler
Jonathan Allen wrote: > Hi All, > > I used to have SA 3.1.0 working with the Spamcop and SBL-type checks > working just fine on my old mail-server (RH6, don't ask) but its > hardware died and I am now trying to get it reworking on a Fedora > Core 2 machine. Install the Net::DNS perl module. Pre

How to get SLB type blocking

2005-12-12 Thread Jonathan Allen
Hi All, I used to have SA 3.1.0 working with the Spamcop and SBL-type checks working just fine on my old mail-server (RH6, don't ask) but its hardware died and I am now trying to get it reworking on a Fedora Core 2 machine. SA was downloaded and installed from CPAN and seems to work in almost eve