On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 08:48:45AM +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
>
> 15.10.2009 8:29, Henrik K kirjoitti:
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 03:33:54AM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 02:44 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
-1.0 RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WRBL: HostKarma: relay
15.10.2009 8:48, Jari Fredriksson kirjoitti:
iki.fi is a famous Finnish email forwarding service and as such should be
added as internal_networks, if you are using it. Things like this are
hard
to know unless you really understand TruthPaths..
All right. I removed internal_networks which o
15.10.2009 8:29, Henrik K kirjoitti:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 03:33:54AM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 02:44 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
-1.0 RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WRBL: HostKarma: relay in white list (first pass)
[212.16.98.53 listed i
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 08:26:02AM +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
>
> 15.10.2009 4:33, Karsten Bräckelmann kirjoitti:
>> On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 02:44 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>>> -1.0 RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WRBL: HostKarma: relay in white list (first pass)
>>> [21
15.10.2009 3:37, Marc Perkel kirjoitti:
TOP HAM RULES FIRED
--
RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM
--
1 RCVD_IN_JMF_W 1115 6.88 0.06 74.98
This is
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 03:33:54AM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 02:44 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> > -1.0 RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WRBL: HostKarma: relay in white list (first pass)
> > [212.16.98.53 listed in
> > hostkarma.junkemailfilter.c
15.10.2009 4:33, Karsten Bräckelmann kirjoitti:
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 02:44 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
-1.0 RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WRBL: HostKarma: relay in white list (first pass)
[212.16.98.53 listed in
hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com]
$ host 212.16.98.53
53.
15.10.2009 6:41, Adam Katz kirjoitti:
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
3.0 RCVD_IN_BRBL_RELAY RBL: received via a relay rated as poor by
Barracuda
[187.10.243.78 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org]
Hmm, a different IP.
...
Any chance your internal and trusted
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>> 3.0 RCVD_IN_BRBL_RELAY RBL: received via a relay rated as poor by
>> Barracuda
>> [187.10.243.78 listed in
>> bb.barracudacentral.org]
>
> Hmm, a different IP.
...
> Any chance your internal and trusted networks are incorrect? Any
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, MySQL Student wrote:
Hi,
http://www.impsec.org/jhardin/antispam/
This should be:
http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/antispam/
(note the missing tilde :-)
Oops. Hand-typed. :(
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 02:44 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> -1.0 RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WRBL: HostKarma: relay in white list (first pass)
> [212.16.98.53 listed in
> hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com]
$ host 212.16.98.53
53.98.16.212.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer jatkuu
Mike Cardwell wrote:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Jari,
How did you produce the great looking statistics?
Thanks,
Rick
It's a perl script called sa-stats.pl
I tried not google it for you, but could not find the original. Many
scripts with the same name though..
I put that to my server as ht
Hi,
> http://www.impsec.org/jhardin/antispam/
This should be:
http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/antispam/
(note the missing tilde :-)
Regards,
Alex
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
14.10.2009 19:17, R-Elists kirjoitti:
All I can say is that if these numbers were real or typical I
would be out of business.
perkel,
i might be wrong, yet it doesnt appear to me that Jari have enough mail
volume to have a reasonable statistical base...
15.10.2009 0:42, Rick Knight kirjoitti:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
15.10.2009 0:21, Rick Knight kirjoitti:
Here's the url for the newer version
"http://www.rulesemporium.com/programs/sa-stats-1.0.txt";.
It's not newer, it's exactly the same version, without or later
additions.
Please to n
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
15.10.2009 0:21, Rick Knight kirjoitti:
Here's the url for the newer version
"http://www.rulesemporium.com/programs/sa-stats-1.0.txt";.
It's not newer, it's exactly the same version, without or later
additions.
Please to not reply to my INBOX, I get confused. My
15.10.2009 0:21, Rick Knight kirjoitti:
Here's the url for the newer version
"http://www.rulesemporium.com/programs/sa-stats-1.0.txt";.
It's not newer, it's exactly the same version, without or later additions.
Please to not reply to my INBOX, I get confused. My Thunderbird sees
your repli
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 14:03 -0700, Rick Knight wrote:
Thanks again for putting the script up. I found the original site and
downloaded the 3.1 version. In the instructions it says "If your top 5
does not contain URIBL_BLACK, see http://www.uribl.com/usage.shtml";.
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
14.10.2009 23:55, Rick Knight kirjoitti:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
14.10.2009 21:49, Mike Cardwell kirjoitti:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Jari,
How did you produce the great looking statistics?
Thanks,
Rick
It's a perl script called sa-stats.pl
I tried not google i
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 14:03 -0700, Rick Knight wrote:
> Thanks again for putting the script up. I found the original site and
> downloaded the 3.1 version. In the instructions it says "If your top 5
> does not contain URIBL_BLACK, see http://www.uribl.com/usage.shtml";. On
> my system URIBL_BLAC
14.10.2009 23:55, Rick Knight kirjoitti:
Jari,
Thanks again for putting the script up. I found the original site and
downloaded the 3.1 version. In the instructions it says "If your top 5
does not contain URIBL_BLACK, see http://www.uribl.com/usage.shtml";. On
my system URIBL_BLACK is number
14.10.2009 23:55, Rick Knight kirjoitti:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
14.10.2009 21:49, Mike Cardwell kirjoitti:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Jari,
How did you produce the great looking statistics?
Thanks,
Rick
It's a perl script called sa-stats.pl
I tried not google it for you, but could not
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
14.10.2009 21:49, Mike Cardwell kirjoitti:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Jari,
How did you produce the great looking statistics?
Thanks,
Rick
It's a perl script called sa-stats.pl
I tried not google it for you, but could not find the original. Many
scripts with the sa
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
14.10.2009 21:49, Mike Cardwell kirjoitti:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> It's a perl script called sa-stats.pl
>
> I have modified the default file so that is scans /var/log/messages
> which works for me (Debian), the script not runs without argum
14.10.2009 21:49, Mike Cardwell kirjoitti:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Jari,
How did you produce the great looking statistics?
Thanks,
Rick
It's a perl script called sa-stats.pl
I tried not google it for you, but could not find the original. Many
scripts with the same name though..
I put t
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Jari,
How did you produce the great looking statistics?
Thanks,
Rick
It's a perl script called sa-stats.pl
I tried not google it for you, but could not find the original. Many
scripts with the same name though..
I put that to my server as http://www.iki.fi/jarif/sa
14.10.2009 20:50, Jari Fredriksson kirjoitti:
which works for me (Debian), the script not runs without arguments.
*now* runs. (s/not/now/g)
--
http://www.iki.fi/jarif/
Q: How many WASPs does it take to change a light bulb?
A: One.
pgpEguqewsBA6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
14.10.2009 20:33, Rick Knight kirjoitti:
Jari,
How did you produce the great looking statistics?
Thanks,
Rick
It's a perl script called sa-stats.pl
I tried not google it for you, but could not find the original. Many
scripts with the same name though..
I put that to my server as http://w
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
14.10.2009 19:17, R-Elists kirjoitti:
All I can say is that if these numbers were real or typical I
would be out of business.
perkel,
i might be wrong, yet it doesnt appear to me that Jari have enough mail
volume to have a reasonable statistical base...
-
14.10.2009 19:17, R-Elists kirjoitti:
All I can say is that if these numbers were real or typical I
would be out of business.
perkel,
i might be wrong, yet it doesnt appear to me that Jari have enough mail
volume to have a reasonable statistical base...
- rh
You are not wrong,
> >
> >
>
> All I can say is that if these numbers were real or typical I
> would be out of business.
>
perkel,
i might be wrong, yet it doesnt appear to me that Jari have enough mail
volume to have a reasonable statistical base...
- rh
Henrik K wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 03:25:36AM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
I just started using Katz's wiki rules and it brought HOSTKARMA with it.
I have not yet seen any blacklists of HOSTKARMA, but the whitelists are
there.
RANK
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 03:25:36AM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
>
>
> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>>
>> I just started using Katz's wiki rules and it brought HOSTKARMA with it.
>>
>> I have not yet seen any blacklists of HOSTKARMA, but the whitelists are
>> there.
>>
>> RANKRULE NAME
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
I just started using Katz's wiki rules and it brought HOSTKARMA with it.
I have not yet seen any blacklists of HOSTKARMA, but the whitelists are
there.
RANKRULE NAME COUNT %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM
9RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL 77
> >
> Funny, after the discussions yesterday, I did the same thing
> only to wake up this morning with a mess of mis-marked
> messages due to hits on hostkarma. Until I can do further
> analysis, I've dropped RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BL and
> RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL to .001 and -.001 respectively.
>
>
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> TOP HAM RULES FIRED
> --
> RANKRULE NAME COUNT %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM
> --
>5RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
I just started using Katz's wiki rules and it brought HOSTKARMA with it.
Is this really a whitelist?
Funny, after the discussions yesterday, I did the same thing only to
wake up this morning with a mess of mis-marked messages due to hits on
hostkarma. Until I can do f
Email: 911 Autolearn: 603 AvgScore: 13.10 AvgScanTime: 12.16 sec
Spam: 462 Autolearn: 414 AvgScore: 33.17 AvgScanTime: 10.80 sec
Ham:449 Autolearn: 189 AvgScore: -7.55 AvgScanTime: 13.55 sec
Time Spent Running SA: 3.08 hours
Time Spent Processing Spam
38 matches
Mail list logo