Hi,
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 13:46 -0400, Alex wrote:
> > On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann <
> guent...@rudersport.de> wrote:
>
> > > This is supposed to be a rawbody rule. I know, because I've discussed
> > > and par
On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 13:46 -0400, Alex wrote:
> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann
> wrote:
> > This is supposed to be a rawbody rule. I know, because I've discussed
> > and partly developed the rule(set) in question with you before, back in
> > Oct 2013. And the RB prefix is
Hi,
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-05-10 at 20:19 -0400, Alex wrote:
> > [...] not sure if something's changed, or the rule never worked as I
> > expected, but it's having problems, and I hoped someone could help.
>
> Something changed indeed -- you br
On Sat, 2014-05-10 at 20:19 -0400, Alex wrote:
> [...] not sure if something's changed, or the rule never worked as I
> expected, but it's having problems, and I hoped someone could help.
Something changed indeed -- you broke the __RB_GT_200 sub-rule.
> body __RB_GT_200 /^.{201}/s
This is suppos
Hi,
I'm having trouble catching spam with short body's, typically just a URL,
sometimes with also some junk text. I've been using a rule developed with
KAM some time ago, but not sure if something's changed, or the rule never
worked as I expected, but it's having problems, and I hoped someone coul
