Hi,
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann <guent...@rudersport.de
> wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-05-10 at 20:19 -0400, Alex wrote:
> > [...] not sure if something's changed, or the rule never worked as I
> > expected, but it's having problems, and I hoped someone could help.
>
> Something changed indeed -- you broke the __RB_GT_200 sub-rule.
>
> > body __RB_GT_200 /^.{201}/s
>
> This is supposed to be a rawbody rule. I know, because I've discussed
> and partly developed the rule(set) in question with you before, back in
> Oct 2013. And the RB prefix is a hint as well. ;)
>
> http://markmail.org/message/ebrm6snglxipj6wx
>
Oh, I remember this thread very well. I referenced your helping me with it
in the beginning of this post. I don't think it was broken all this time,
as I know I tested it quite extensively, but I don't know how it became a
body instead of rawbody rule. Since I thought for sure it was once working,
I didn't even think it was something I did.
It wasn't a case of not understanding the difference between body and
rawbody, at least. I plan to experiment further with the body version
you've just created, and see if there's usefulness with that in other cases.
Thanks again,
Alex
> --
> char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno
> \x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
> main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8?
> c<<=1:
> (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0;
> }}}
>
>
