Agreed, it seems to be deliberate to get people moved over to the big
providers, they are clearly discouraging independent email servers as
they clearly scored differently.
I have even been doing tests on various spare unused ip's and the
amount that get blocked by microsoft (but no other provider
Cian is rumored to have said:
Anne, I am incredibly grateful for the offer. I sent my emails to the
tester and to the support email. Hopefully, they come up with
something actionable.
If you get a useful result it might be nice to summarize it to the list.
Loren
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022, Greg Troxel wrote:
As for your "domain", also look up the IP address your mail comes from, because
that's more important.
A lookup service I have found useful is:
https://multirbl.valli.org/
Ok, actually, I got some interesting results for 136.143.188.53, which
is a Zo
Thanks for the advice, Greg.
>I am not saying what you should do. My point is that you do not seem to
truly understand what is going on (fair enough, the world is opaque and
complicated) and that understanding it is good.
I would agree with this statement. The challenge is, it is very
difficult
Cian, first, MailTester (and also the other automated systems) is notoriously
bad about giving false negatives because so long as it finds *a* record (such
as an SPF record) it considers it "ok"; this is why we've gone to a
human-review system for test emails - I'd say in at least half the cases
Cian ApacheBugzilla writes:
>> However, the shared IP comment is worth paying attention to
>
> Ah, so you think I should get a dedicated IP? I had read mixed things
I meant tha you should understand what's going on.
> I'm a little confused which way you mean this. If I understand
> correctly
On 19.02.22 08:32, Cian ApacheBugzilla wrote:
Thanks for the advice Greg!
Your mail is in html
Bill Cole mentioned that, and I did try sending a plain text email to
no effect. The email that you are replying to is unusually atrocious
because the only way I could figure out to reply to a mail
Thanks for the advice Greg!
>Your mail is in html
Bill Cole mentioned that, and I did try sending a plain text email to
no effect. The email that you are replying to is unusually atrocious
because the only way I could figure out to reply to a mailing list
email I hadn't received was, ironically,
Complain to the European Union. It is not in Microsoft's and google's interest
to fix this. By frustrating/sabotaging other providers services, they create an
environment where users are forced to switch to the outlook.com/gmail.com
cloud. Eg. what you have done is already more than gmail.com is
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022, 01:10 Cian, wrote:
> I am also having a world of trouble getting my emails to Outlook users.
> For reference, my work domain has one user (me). I have had the account
> for about 9 months and I have not yet sent 100 emails. I typically send an
> email to a single recipient,
Your mail is in html. That will get it some points; I suggest
text/plain :-) Many will say I'm just being a curmudgeon about
this. Attempting to recover content and continuing:
Cian writes:
> I am also having a world of trouble getting my emails to Outlook
> users. For reference, my wo
I am also having a world of trouble getting my emails to Outlook users. For reference, my work domain has one user (me). I have had the account for about 9 months and I have not yet sent 100 emails. I typically send an email to a single recipient, although I will occasionally CC a handful of peo
On 09.04.21 15:40, mau...@gmx.ch wrote:
Spam will send from Gmx to domain.ch and so I recieve every spam mail.
you should filter spam before forwarding then.
Please what I need read, or any help to minimize the rush, thanks for any
possible help!
unfortunately, you missed all Received: he
Sorry Benny,
>> Please broter make shorter way, I don’t have plenty of time 😊
>do you know what sieve autoreader is ?
historical questions?
>long version: i don need time to read reply's anymore
… m please let me think, it’s a other mailinglist?, yes, ok I understood !
If you
On 2021-04-09 16:59, mau...@gmx.ch wrote:
Please broter make shorter way, I don’t have plenty of time 😊
do you know what sieve autoreader is ?
long version: i don need time to read reply's anymore
>https://sanesecurity.com/
> there is a maillist for this aswell, ask on maillist with clamav signature
> catch it
>
> or build localy own signature to catch it, spammers is very genious in 2021
> and others is not :=)
But this are a joke? I need contact any other mailinglist, and you
On 2021-04-09 15:40, mau...@gmx.ch wrote:
Spam will send from Gmx to domain.ch and so I recieve every spam
mail.
Please what I need read, or any help to minimize the rush, thanks for
any possible help!
https://sanesecurity.com/
there is a maillist for this aswell, ask on maillist with clama
-03-20) on nmail.domain.ch
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at nmail.domain.ch
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Von: Loren Wilton mailto:lwil...@earthlink.net> >
Gesendet: Freitag, 9. April 2021 10:11
An: users@spamassassin.apache.org <mailto:users@spamassassin.apache.org>
Betreff: Re:
We would need to see the original headers from the spam, or ideally the whole
spam before we could say anything. It would also be helpful to see the rules it
hit on your system.
Loren
After implementing spamassassin and spamssassin, the situation are better
then bevor.
also lot of women picture from Hotmail or gmail, but sencerly how I can
eliminate this?
Please how it's possible for block, this kind of mail?
Thanks
Hello
Please how i can filter/ban E-Mail from Hotmail, Outlook, with women
pictures.
Yes spamassassin and meny other tools installed and will block meny of bad
E-Mail, the email With picture and more will also transfer.
I think that I am on the right way with the application Spamassassin, I
On 26/09/2017 20:08, David Jones wrote:
There is the possibility that Hotmail doesn't like our IP address
because it is a consumer/ADSL/end-user IP - although I've removed it
from the Spamhaus PBL database. I guess Hotmail must be using an
internal database
I would put money on
dresses, as there is other infrastructure tied to this IP address
(vpn, external laptops etc.) - so it would involve quite a bit of
reconfiguration. Also, I doubt that it would do much good, as we've had
this IP address for 5 years - so it is clean. There is the possibility
that Hotmail do
You need to learn from the feedback you received. Your server is still
rejecting mail to postmas...@open-t.co.uk and ab...@open-t.co.uk, no wonder you
are blacklisted!
his IP address
(vpn, external laptops etc.) - so it would involve quite a bit of
reconfiguration. Also, I doubt that it would do much good, as we've had
this IP address for 5 years - so it is clean. There is the possibility
that Hotmail doesn't like our IP address because it i
John Hardin skrev den 2017-09-21 17:06:
and just received an email saying that the IP address doesn't qualify
for mitigation. I'm not
sure if that means that the IP address is already clean at their end,
or it is blacklisted
or greylisted, but they don't want to unblock it.
Or perhaps "you're
On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
and just received an email saying that the IP address doesn't qualify
for mitigation. I'm not sure if that means that the IP address is
already clean at their end, or it is blacklisted or greylisted, but they
don't want to unblock it.
Or perhaps "y
it is blacklisted or greylisted, but they don't
want to unblock it.
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Sebastian Arcus <mailto:s.ar...@open-t.co.uk>> wrote:
On 19/09/17 10:29, Zulma Pape wrote:
There are tons of ways to get your IP a good reputation with
Hotm
ne
might throw in a useful idea - which would be much appreciated.
I have this problem on one site where most emails we send to
Hotmail/Outlook.com/Live.com email addresses end up in Junk at the
recipient's end. Things I have tried:
1. I've setup SPF, DKIM, DMARC (and set it to &#
On 19/09/17 10:29, Zulma Pape wrote:
There are tons of ways to get your IP a good reputation with Hotmail.
Start setting up the SNDS, this will help you monitor your reputation
directly with Microsoft.
Hi - thank you for the suggestions. I have signed up for the SNDS
programme - which looks
copy of the header, then look for clues in their
anti-spam report.
Good luck with that.
Have you ever seen the kind of stuff that M$ adds to
Hotmail/Outlook.com/Office365 etc.. messages?
Then when you try to track down any info on how to iterpret the dense pile of
stuff in a 'x-foref
> 10. The emails we send are operational and notices emails to customers -
who need them. They call on the phone and complain they haven't received
them - just to discover they were sent, but ended up in the junk.
Tell them to send you a copy of the header, then look for clues in their
anti-spam
row in
> a useful idea - which would be much appreciated. I have this problem on one
> site where most emails we send to Hotmail/Outlook.com/Live.com email
> addresses end up in Junk at the recipient's end. Things I have tried: 1. I've
> setup SPF, DKIM, DMARC (and set it to &#x
ed to SA, but I'm
hoping that with the email and spam expertise on this group, someone
might throw in a useful idea - which would be much appreciated.
I have this problem on one site where most emails we send to
Hotmail/Outlook.com/Live.com email addresses end up in Junk at the
recipient&#
most emails we send to
Hotmail/Outlook.com/Live.com email addresses end up in Junk at the
recipient's end. Things I have tried:
1. I've setup SPF, DKIM, DMARC (and set it to 'reject').
2. We used to smart relay outbound email through the hosting provider
(1and1), but now
ppreciated.
I have this problem on one site where most emails we send to
Hotmail/Outlook.com/Live.com email addresses end up in Junk at the
recipient's end. Things I have tried:
1. I've setup SPF, DKIM, DMARC (and set it to 'reject').
2. We used to smart relay outbound
This is a bit off topic as it is not directly related to SA, but I'm
hoping that with the email and spam expertise on this group, someone
might throw in a useful idea - which would be much appreciated.
I have this problem on one site where most emails we send to
Hotmail/Outlook.com/Liv
On 5/1/2017 3:51 PM, John Hardin wrote:
Primarily, get the masscheck infrastructure working again.
This is moving along. Thanks to some volunteers like David Jones, we
are working on rebuilding that system with documentation so that we
don't go through this again!
Regards,
KAM
On Mon, 1 May 2017, Alex wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 12:46 AM, Axb wrote:
On 04/30/2017 10:48 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 30 Apr 2017, Alex wrote:
Hi, is it possible hotmail is now using outlook.com to route and
process their email? Or perhaps this user is using outlook to send
Hi,
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 12:46 AM, Axb wrote:
> On 04/30/2017 10:48 PM, John Hardin wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 30 Apr 2017, Alex wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, is it possible hotmail is now using outlook.com to route and
>>> process their email? Or perhaps this user is
On Sun, 30 Apr 2017, Alex wrote:
process their email? Or perhaps this user is using outlook to send
their hotmail mail? If so, I believe the FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2 rule is
not considering this possibility.
On 04/30/2017 10:48 PM, John Hardin wrote:
That's entirely possible. I'm p
On 04/30/2017 10:48 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 30 Apr 2017, Alex wrote:
Hi, is it possible hotmail is now using outlook.com to route and
process their email? Or perhaps this user is using outlook to send
their hotmail mail? If so, I believe the FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2 rule is
not considering
John Hardin skrev den 2017-04-30 22:48:
That's entirely possible. I'm pretty sure I've seen messages
purporting to be from a hotmail user that were processed by
outlook.com. I'll check my corpora and see if I can confirm that.
i have seen most spam hotmail.com senders
On Sun, 30 Apr 2017, Alex wrote:
Hi, is it possible hotmail is now using outlook.com to route and
process their email? Or perhaps this user is using outlook to send
their hotmail mail? If so, I believe the FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2 rule is
not considering this possibility.
That's entirely pos
Hi, is it possible hotmail is now using outlook.com to route and
process their email? Or perhaps this user is using outlook to send
their hotmail mail? If so, I believe the FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2 rule is
not considering this possibility.
Received: from BN3NAM04FT034.eop-NAM04
Hi,
sorry if discussed before and i missed it but,
the rule FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2 triggers when a hotmail email does not come from
hotmail or msn servers, but actually they come oftenly from outlook.com
regards,
-PedroD
Hello RW,
Sunday, January 25, 2015, 10:55:59 PM, you wrote:
R> There's not much that can be done about this other than rescore or
R> remove it entirely.
But this rule and MISSING_HEADERS combine to score 3.8 just because the
sender put all the recipients in BCC
Seems a touch high for this.
-
Am 25.01.2015 um 23:55 schrieb RW:
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 08:19:02 +
Niamh Holding wrote:
Sample at http://pastebin.com/mEFpUeS5
There's not much that can be done about this other than rescore or
remove it entirely.
It's picking up on the combination of FREEMAIL_FROM and a missing
"From" he
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 08:19:02 +
Niamh Holding wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> Sample at http://pastebin.com/mEFpUeS5
>
There's not much that can be done about this other than rescore or
remove it entirely.
It's picking up on the combination of FREEMAIL_FROM and a missing
"From" header. Since most cl
Hello
Sample at http://pastebin.com/mEFpUeS5
--
Best regards,
Niamh mailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpe8wUMrN5Vl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
locally defined ones.
This works well here: the only difference is that I archive all incoming
and outgoing mail and use my archive as the sender-whitelisting plugin's
data source.
That's pretty much what I've been doing too - hotmail, yahoo and aol
score 6pts by default and legi
On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 20:02 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> > I may never know they sent me an email.
> > Unless I spend time going over my logs.
>
> ah you have logs ? :=)
>
A possible way out is to process the logs overnight, possibly as part of
logwatch, and build a datastore of addresses that
mains like yahoo or hotmail or even aol.
to big to be loved here, to much free and rfc-ignorant, no go !
There are legitimate
accounts on them.
yes, and spammers use this fact to get bypassed for not use ther domain
as default blacklisted_from and whitelisted non spammers, oh well :)
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 05:12:59 -0700
Paul Cabot wrote:
> The freemailer to freemailer idea is good.Chances are that is
> more likely to be spam.
It's separate freemail "from" and "reply-to" that's a good indicator,
not "from" and "to". In fraud spams they commonly use a different
account for
On 16/10/2011 12:13 AM, haman...@t-online.de wrote:
I've noticed a trend recently where I'm getting emails sent to me from
either an aol or yahoo or hotmail account. But the email has a "to"
address to some other account that is not mine.
First off I'm p...@topgunco
oo or hotmail or even aol. There are legitimate
accounts on them. So unless someone gives me their email address
before sending me an email. I may never know they sent me an email.
Unless I spend time going over my logs.
The random chars I sort of realized had something to do with a way of
tryi
>>
>> I've noticed a trend recently where I'm getting emails sent to me from
>> either an aol or yahoo or hotmail account. But the email has a "to"
>> address to some other account that is not mine.
>>
>> First off I'
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 16:40:48 -0700, Paul Cabot wrote:
blacklist_from *@aol.com
whitelist_from_spf good-us...@aol.com
users can then get a new url for free :-)
Would that not blacklist everyone from aol.com unless I specifically
allowed them with the whitelist_from_spf setting?
currect
if it
On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 16:39 -0700, Paul Cabot wrote:
> On 15/10/2011 3:39 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> > > Is there any way of blocking emails sent to me that are not really
> > > addressed to me.
> >
> > ...you don't ever want to receive legitimate BCCs?
Or these very list posts, addressing the que
On 15/10/2011 3:52 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 14:32:07 -0700, Paul Cabot wrote:
I've noticed a trend recently where I'm getting emails sent to me
from either an aol or yahoo or hotmail account. But the email has a
"to" address to some other acco
On 15/10/2011 3:39 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Paul Cabot wrote:
Is there any way of blocking emails sent to me that are not really
addressed to me.
...you don't ever want to receive legitimate BCCs?
Didn't think about the fact that it would be because of me being a BCC.
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 15:39:24 -0700 (PDT), John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Paul Cabot wrote:
Is there any way of blocking emails sent to me that are not really
addressed to me.
...you don't ever want to receive legitimate BCCs?
blacklist_to *@aol.com
:-)
eg if header to contains sp
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 14:32:07 -0700, Paul Cabot wrote:
I've noticed a trend recently where I'm getting emails sent to me
from either an aol or yahoo or hotmail account. But the email has a
"to" address to some other account that is not mine.
blacklist_from *@aol.com
whitel
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Paul Cabot wrote:
Is there any way of blocking emails sent to me that are not really addressed
to me.
...you don't ever want to receive legitimate BCCs?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 p
I've noticed a trend recently where I'm getting emails sent to me from
either an aol or yahoo or hotmail account. But the email has a "to"
address to some other account that is not mine.
First off I'm p...@topguncomputers.com. I also run the postfix servers.
Usual
On 04/10/11 05:50, Alex wrote:
Hi,
I have a fedora15 box with v3.3.2 and I have some hotmail spam that I
can't figure out how to catch:
http://pastebin.com/kkUUvYQp
It's hitting BAYES_00 and no blacklists or other significant spam
rules and not sure how to tag it. The user ha
Hi,
>> I have a fedora15 box with v3.3.2 and I have some hotmail spam that I
>> can't figure out how to catch:
>>
>> http://pastebin.com/kkUUvYQp
>>
>> It's hitting BAYES_00 and no blacklists or other significant spam
>> rules and not sure
On 03/10/11 01:31, Alex wrote:
Hi all,
I have a fedora15 box with v3.3.2 and I have some hotmail spam that I
can't figure out how to catch:
http://pastebin.com/kkUUvYQp
It's hitting BAYES_00 and no blacklists or other significant spam
rules and not sure how to tag it. The user ha
I followed the link and ended up downloading a Windows worm to my Linux
laptop (Worm:Win32/Cridex.B if you care)
So this isn't spam - it's a malware-run. Totally different rules apply
to malware than spam - this sort of thing can only be fought by SA with
RBL/SURBLs
So the best response here woul
On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 20:31 -0400, Alex wrote:
> I have some hotmail spam that I can't figure out how to catch:
>
> http://pastebin.com/kkUUvYQp
>
> It's hitting BAYES_00 and no blacklists or other significant spam
> rules and not sure how to tag it. The user has re
Hi all,
I have a fedora15 box with v3.3.2 and I have some hotmail spam that I
can't figure out how to catch:
http://pastebin.com/kkUUvYQp
It's hitting BAYES_00 and no blacklists or other significant spam
rules and not sure how to tag it. The user has reported receiving this
spam sev
g prejudiced
against Yahoo or Hotmail though.
Warren
4 points for spam-source and that seems to work pretty well.
We don't get too many Yahoo or Hotmail spams slipping through and the
FP rate is not too bad.
We concur that Google has cleaned up its act tremendously since a year or
two ago and is far cleaner than Hotmail or Yahoo.
Regards,
David.
ail separate from typical
FREEMAIL.
Been there, tried that. It is like stopping a river. I've tried metas with
the originating source (FROM_AFRICA rules), metas with keywords, metas with
short_urls... the list of junk coming out of Yahoo and Hotmail is just
endless.
Like you, I've
On Mar 6, 2011, at 3:37 AM, Mynabbler wrote:
> The amount of junkmail coming from your systems is unbelievable. How hard is
> it to implement a cap on the amount of messages people can send out daily
> with your systems.
They do that.
> And that includes the number of Cc's and Bcc's one
> messag
mail separate from typical
> FREEMAIL.
>
Been there, tried that. It is like stopping a river. I've tried metas with
the originating source (FROM_AFRICA rules), metas with keywords, metas with
short_urls... the list of junk coming out of Yahoo and Hotmail is just
endless. And again, the sol
On 3/6/2011 3:15 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 06/03/11 11:46, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
I have no comment on your proposed solution. I can however point out the
statistics that I see on my own spam traps.
It seems that 90%+ of the spam coming from DNSWL listed hosts is Yahoo
and Hotmail which are
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 13:15:01 +, Ned Slider wrote:
> Personally I think it's about time FROM_HOTMAIL and FROM_YAHOO became
> high scoring stock rules in SpamAssassin. A score of 3 points might be a
> reasonable starting point.
or RFC_ABUSE_POST score 10
atleast then thay have a chance
htt
Ned Slider wrote:
> On 06/03/11 11:46, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
>> I have no comment on your proposed solution. I can however point out
>> the statistics that I see on my own spam traps.
>>
>> It seems that 90%+ of the spam coming from DNSWL listed hosts is
>> Y
On 06/03/11 11:46, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
I have no comment on your proposed solution. I can however point out the
statistics that I see on my own spam traps.
It seems that 90%+ of the spam coming from DNSWL listed hosts is Yahoo
and Hotmail which are listed as DNSWL_NONE. Meanwhile very few
I have no comment on your proposed solution. I can however point out
the statistics that I see on my own spam traps.
It seems that 90%+ of the spam coming from DNSWL listed hosts is Yahoo
and Hotmail which are listed as DNSWL_NONE. Meanwhile very few spam
comes from gmail.com. Apparently
re a Yahoo administrator, the cap from
%account%---%numb...@att.net need to be set to 10 messages daily.
Sigh.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Open-letter-to-Yahoo-and-Hotmail-concerning-junkmail-tp31079893p31079893.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Kris Deugau wrote:
DNSBLs are pretty much useless, since the message *was* legitimately
relayed in from Hotmail.
A couple of times I've seen enough examples with similar enough URLs
to create a uri rule something like:
John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Kris Deugau wrote:
DNSBLs are pretty much useless, since the message *was* legitimately
relayed in from Hotmail.
A couple of times I've seen enough examples with similar enough URLs
to create a uri rule something like:
uri MISC_INFOm|
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Kris Deugau wrote:
DNSBLs are pretty much useless, since the message *was* legitimately
relayed in from Hotmail.
A couple of times I've seen enough examples with similar enough URLs to
create a uri rule something like:
uri MISC_INFO m|https?://rita..sa..ly\
Anyone else seeing anything like this:
http://www.deepnet.cx/~kdeugau/hotmail-spam.eml
slipping through?
Bayes is about the only thing I see getting any kind of ongoing handle
on these (and that, BAYES_60 is a reason to celebrate) - the only
content worth matching with more static rules is
On 7/29/10 8:44 PM, Ray Dzek wrote:
Hi all,
I updated to 3.3.1 last week. The capture rate went way up, which is
good, but… I am now getting complaints that “legit” Hotmail is getting
tagged pretty much for every email coming in.
set the freemail scores to 0
What would be the recommended
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 17:44:23 -0700, Ray Dzek wrote:
> I updated to 3.3.1 last week. The capture rate went way up, which is
> good, but... I am now getting complaints that "legit" Hotmail is
> getting tagged pretty much for every email coming in.
Which rules are hitting? D
Hi all,
I updated to 3.3.1 last week. The capture rate went way up, which is good,
but... I am now getting complaints that "legit" Hotmail is getting tagged
pretty much for every email coming in.
What would be the recommended way to dial down the Hotmail detection?
Thanks!
Ray Dz
On 05/26/2010 05:29 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Also, these Hotmail injected footers always use long-ish URIs with a
path, no? In that case, a meta with __URI_NO_PATH could help. Something
like this.
uri __URI_NO_PATH m~^https?://[^/]+/?$~
That's possibly a good idea. I was thi
> > I see quite a few of these from hotmail orginating from China.
> X-Originating-IP: [123.161.74.4]
>
> is listed in Spamhaus (SPL) and I deep parse headers so I got a hit on this.
Unlike PBL and XBL, Spamhaus SBL is safe for deep-parsing. Which SA does
for this par
On 05/26/2010 09:33 PM, Lennart Johansson wrote:
My first post, please don't kill me for doing some things wrong.
I see quite a few of these from hotmail orginating from China.
http://pastebin.com/q308E7ZG
SA score:
Score Matching Rule Descriptioncached not
result=
On man 09 nov 2009 13:56:27 CET, "Casartello, Thomas" wrote
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft's powerful SPAM protection. Sign up
now.
why not enable it ?
but for others:
give a big spam score for rfc-i
give a big ham score for users at hotmail that does not spam you
meta
27;m getting confused as to if I can do this with SA - I think I'm clear
that the Relay Countries won't look at this kind of header(?), and that
checking them against blocklists is not appropriate as by nature they
will probably be in the PBL. But is there a way to grab these by
geographi
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:09:18 +
"rich...@buzzhost.co.uk" wrote:
>
> Running those through my SA gets the biggest hit for the second
> example with the Indian link in the body. But that's a custom rule
> kindly given to me by of one of the good people on this list.
>
> I'm more concerned with
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: [SPAM:6.0] Spam coming from hotmail.
On 09.11.09 09:20, Casartello, Thomas wrote:
> Yeah I should have attached those instead of copying and pasting the
> Outlook crap. Was pretty stupid, my apologies.
no, you should have publiched them somewhere and paste a li
Running those through my SA gets the biggest hit for the second example
with the Indian link in the body. But that's a custom rule kindly given
to me by of one of the good people on this list.
I'm more concerned with this:
X-Originating-IP: [189.69.146.53]
In Brazil yet my relay module does not
ailing list recommends that.
btw, it was this advertising signature what made him laugh:
> > ______
> > Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft's powerful SPAM protection. Sign
> > up now.
--
Matus UHLAR - fanto
-
From: Casartello, Thomas
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 9:20 AM
To: 'rich...@buzzhost.co.uk'
Cc: Spamassassin Mailing List
Subject: RE: [SPAM:6.0] Spam coming from hotmail.
Yeah I should have attached those instead of copying and pasting the Outlook
crap. Was pretty stupid, my apologies.
)
-Original Message-
From: rich...@buzzhost.co.uk [mailto:rich...@buzzhost.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 8:47 AM
Cc: Spamassassin Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SPAM:6.0] Spam coming from hotmail.
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 07:56 -0500, Casartello, Thomas wrote:
> I’ve been getting a lot of
1 - 100 of 223 matches
Mail list logo
