On Fri, 9 Dec 2011, LEVEAU Stanislas wrote:
Hi
I am looking for French rules with sa-update?
I wrote a few some years/months ago and since the feedback was "this is
too aggressive" (well, "it works for me"(tm)...) I did not go any further.
I do not know where the &q
Several of your remarks are not interesting. You spam the list! You do
not have to stay on the list
Thanks
Le 09/12/2011 18:37, Walter Hurry a écrit :
On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:29:04 +0100, Axb wrote:
On 2011-12-09 18:25, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 9 Dec 2011, Axb wrote:
If someone can provi
Italian ham is the best. Mmm, prosciutto!
Boo... Can anyone tell me how to block Walter's bad jokes ;-)
On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:29:04 +0100, Axb wrote:
> On 2011-12-09 18:25, John Hardin wrote:
>> On Fri, 9 Dec 2011, Axb wrote:
>>
>>> If someone can provide a french spam feed I'd be willing to autocreate
>>> SOUGHT_like rules.
>>
>> ..._AND_ French ham. Both are needed...
>
> I have french ham, but
On 2011-12-09 18:25, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 9 Dec 2011, Axb wrote:
If someone can provide a french spam feed I'd be willing to autocreate
SOUGHT_like rules.
..._AND_ French ham. Both are needed...
I have french ham, but very little spam
On Fri, 9 Dec 2011, Axb wrote:
If someone can provide a french spam feed I'd be willing to autocreate
SOUGHT_like rules.
..._AND_ French ham. Both are needed...
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar..
On 2011-12-09 0:51, LEVEAU Stanislas wrote:
Hi
I am looking for French rules with sa-update?
Does it exist?
Regards
Stan
If someone can provide a french spam feed I'd be willing to autocreate
SOUGHT_like rules. Someone else would have to provide the sa-update DNS
foo & downl
yes I know but the rules are obsolete
Thanks
regards
Le 09/12/2011 02:33, dar...@chaosreigns.com a écrit :
On 12/09, LEVEAU Stanislas wrote:
I am looking for French rules with sa-update?
Does it exist?
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets includes "French Rules&
On 12/08/2011 03:51 PM, LEVEAU Stanislas wrote:
> I am looking for French rules with sa-update?
> Does it exist?
Most of the body rules in previous versions of SpamAssassin were phased
out because the Bayesian filter does a *significantly* better job at
that sort of thing. The few that
On 12/09, LEVEAU Stanislas wrote:
>I am looking for French rules with sa-update?
>Does it exist?
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets includes "French Rules",
but its status is listed as "defunct".
--
"Life is either a daring adventure or
Hi
I am looking for French rules with sa-update?
Does it exist?
Regards
Stan
John GALLET wrote:
Re,
Anyway, these are the patterns I tried to code in FR_SPAMISLEGAL and
FR_HOWTOUNSUBSCRIBE, plus one I considered too generic (if you can't
read this mail in html, click here).
It might be worth collecting more ham that includes any such common
text -- or even _generating
John Wilcock writes:
> Justin Mason a écrit :
> > John GALLET writes:
> >> Well, thanks for writing it. I think its main weak point for French and
> >> other accented languages is handling the different encodings for a same
> >> char with an accent, some kind of "synonyms" list. The same letter,
Justin Mason a écrit :
John GALLET writes:
Well, thanks for writing it. I think its main weak point for French and
other accented languages is handling the different encodings for a same
char with an accent, some kind of "synonyms" list. The same letter, say "a
with an accent", can be misspell
John GALLET writes:
> Re,
>
> >> Anyway, these are the patterns I tried to code in FR_SPAMISLEGAL and
> >> FR_HOWTOUNSUBSCRIBE, plus one I considered too generic (if you can't
> >> read this mail in html, click here).
> >
> > It might be worth collecting more ham that includes any such common
> >
Re,
Anyway, these are the patterns I tried to code in FR_SPAMISLEGAL and
FR_HOWTOUNSUBSCRIBE, plus one I considered too generic (if you can't
read this mail in html, click here).
It might be worth collecting more ham that includes any such common
text -- or even _generating_ mails along those
John GALLET writes:
> Hi,
>
> > You run "seek-phrases-in-corpus" over the 2 corpora, and it'll spit out
> > the patterns; you can then write rules based on these.
>
> I did so, the results are interesting, though I do not really know where
> to go from there. If I take the first 50 "best" patte
John GALLET a écrit :
I think I have a newbye simple problem of philosophy/strategy: my
approach, for what it's worth, was that I flag anything that contains
some unsubscribe links and French law reminders because anyway all the
ones I receive are spam, and I add the opt-in mailing/newsletter I
Hi,
If these are hit rates with a very minimal daily corpus, don't know if the
present ruleset is ready for production unless you have 0 tolerance for any
bulk, period
I'm afraid I must agree. I don't have a confirmed and sorted corpus per se,
but after a single night's live testing with ver
On Dienstag, 24. Juni 2008 John Wilcock wrote:
> with just a bit of fine tuning
I guess John Gallet needs a bigger corpus, maybe you could share some
ham/spam with him. He does the work to create the rules, and with
better corpus the rules will become better. I know this, I maintain the
GERMAN
Yet Another Ninja a écrit :
If these are hit rates with a very minimal daily corpus, don't know if
the present ruleset is ready for production unless you have 0 tolerance
for any bulk, period
I'm afraid I must agree. I don't have a confirmed and sorted corpus per
se, but after a single night'
Re,
I excluded the last two rules from my masscheck to avoid FPs as these
ESPs/X-Mailers are definitely grey, "import rcpt list and blast" sort of ESPs
not black for global use.
If you can point me to some more information on how to do that, on-list or
off-list, I am interested. I am new to
Hi,
You run "seek-phrases-in-corpus" over the 2 corpora, and it'll spit out
the patterns; you can then write rules based on these.
I did so, the results are interesting, though I do not really know where
to go from there. If I take the first 50 "best" patterns and strip off the
obvious stand
On 6/23/2008 4:36 PM, John GALLET wrote:
Hi,
First of all, thanks to Justin for patiently helping me to install
mass-check and pointing me in the right direction. I will try to run the
algorithms tonight to see what they come up with.
In the meantime, you can find a hit-frequencies report at
Thanks for taking this burden upon yourself. One other thing you should be
prepared to do, if you're willing to devote long-term responsibility to these
rules, is to provide sa-update-compatible feeds of your dynamic rules. This
is another thing that Justin can probably help you with.
I am hap
Re,
Looking at the rules, I'm worried about false positives on genuine opt-in
advertising. I have a number of users who choose to receive all kinds of
advertising blurb,
This is one of the reasons why I did not hunt for "click here" and "if you
can't see this email in html". Now correct me i
John GALLET a écrit :
Any feedback on the results (not enough in corpus, bad rules, good
rules, etc.) appreciated.
Looking at the rules, I'm worried about false positives on genuine
opt-in advertising. I have a number of users who choose to receive all
kinds of advertising blurb, so I'll run
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, John GALLET wrote:
First of all, thanks to Justin for patiently helping me to install
mass-check and pointing me in the right direction.
Applause for Justin! This is the sort of thing we need to see for many
more specialized spam categories...
I will try to run the alg
Hi,
First of all, thanks to Justin for patiently helping me to install
mass-check and pointing me in the right direction. I will try to run the
algorithms tonight to see what they come up with.
In the meantime, you can find a hit-frequencies report at:
http://www.saphirtech.fr/spam/freqs_2008
Giampaolo Tomassoni writes:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 5:49 PM
> > To: Giampaolo Tomassoni
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> > Subject:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 5:49 PM
> To: Giampaolo Tomassoni
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Rule Set proposal] French Rules
>
> ...omissis...
>
Giampaolo Tomassoni writes:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 5:28 PM
> > To: Giampaolo Tomassoni
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> > Subject:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 5:28 PM
> To: Giampaolo Tomassoni
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Rule Set proposal] French Rules
>
>
>
Giampaolo Tomassoni writes:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 12:10 PM
> > To: John GALLET
> > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [Rule Set propos
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 12:10 PM
> To: John GALLET
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Rule Set proposal] French Rules
>
> ...omissis...
>
> by the way, if you&
I still miss samples for two rules, even if I did had hits according to
/var/spool/maillog I did not save them.
I added a sample for the FR_NOTSPAM rule, and I removed the
FR_YOURELUCKY rule as I see other forms of the text getting through so
it is not efficient. On the other hand, nearly al
ch and (no disrespect meant) I would agree with
> the comments I read about the current French Ruleset being inadequate
> (tried it, did not keep any of it).
>
> So I would like to propose a set for French Rules and get your feedback.
by the way, if you're reasonably perl-cap
Hi,
I was able to access the URL you mentioned, but not all of the files
below it. I received:
"Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /spam/FR_PAYLESSTAXES.txt on this server."
Sorry guys, only the ruleset file (the one I tried, of course) was
readable, all the non empty spam samples
org, there have been few
> subjects about spam in French and (no disrespect meant) I would agree with
> the comments I read about the current French Ruleset being inadequate (tried
> it, did not keep any of it).
>
> So I would like to propose a set for French Rules and get your feedback.
&
comments I read about the current French Ruleset being inadequate
(tried it, did not keep any of it).
So I would like to propose a set for French Rules and get your feedback.
You can find both the rules and some sample spam email messages (two of
them missing, I have hits in my log files, but
Anton Melser wrote:
Hi,
I have been looking for a set of rules that have been specially done
for combating French spam (in particular content). I found those at
http://maxime.ritter.eu.org, but they aren't official, and I was
wondering whether people know about any others.
last time I tried the
Hi,
I have been looking for a set of rules that have been specially done
for combating French spam (in particular content). I found those at
http://maxime.ritter.eu.org, but they aren't official, and I was
wondering whether people know about any others.
Cheers
Anton
42 matches
Mail list logo
