From: "John D. Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, Bob Proulx wrote:
That is not good. What tool would trust the header contents the
message came in with?
True for a header that says "this is NOT spam", but what spammer is
going to put in a header saying "this message IS spam"
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, Bob Proulx wrote:
> That is not good. What tool would trust the header contents the
> message came in with?
True for a header that says "this is NOT spam", but what spammer is
going to put in a header saying "this message IS spam" ?
It may be justified to trust an X-Spam: Y
From: "Bob Proulx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Michael Monnerie wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Meanwhile, I do think that filtering outgoing mail from such places
> as open internet nodes at hotels and other places like that is
> probably a good thing. But simply tagging by itself does not seem
> useful to
Bob Proulx wrote:
There exist many tools that filter on SpamAssassin headers (Mozilla
Thunderbird), so it can be valuable for the receiver's filter to have
that scan results. Even for a company: If one PC got some infection and
sends SPAM, at least you marked all messages as such.
That is not
Michael Monnerie wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Meanwhile, I do think that filtering outgoing mail from such places
> > as open internet nodes at hotels and other places like that is
> > probably a good thing. But simply tagging by itself does not seem
> > useful to me.
>
> It's a legal thing: Yo
On Montag, 19. Juni 2006 05:42 Bob Proulx wrote:
> Meanwhile, I do think that filtering outgoing mail from such places
> as open internet nodes at hotels and other places like that is
> probably a good thing. But simply tagging by itself does not seem
> useful to me.
It's a legal thing: You are n
Loren Wilton wrote:
> I found this in the original headers of a stock spam (before it picked up 67
> points on my system):
:-)
However what I have been seeing is that a lot of sites are processing
*outgoing* mail through spamassassin. More than likely a spam virus
infected cable 'bot sent the me
I found this in the original headers of a stock spam (before it picked up 67
points on my system):
X-Spam-Tests: BAYES_00=-2.599,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK=3.92,
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.056,RAZOR2_CHECK=1.511,STOCK_ALERT=2.385
X-Spam-Score: 5.3
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on
