Heute (28.12.2006/13:27 Uhr) schrieb decoder,
>>
>> spamassassin --lint Subroutine FuzzyOcr::O_NONBLOCK redefined at
>> /usr/share/perl/5.8/Exporter.pm line 65. at
>> /usr/lib/perl/5.8/POSIX.pm line 19
>>
>> What is that still?
> This is no FuzzyOcr problem but a perl core problem. Two core perl
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Knuth wrote:
> Heute (28.12.2006/05:10 Uhr) schrieb Gary V,
>
Jim, I have been working on a doc for Debian. It is
unfinished but may
>>> help
you through some rough spots at this point. I have no idea
when I'll
>>> have
ti
Heute (28.12.2006/05:10 Uhr) schrieb Gary V,
>> > Jim, I have been working on a doc for Debian. It is unfinished but may
>>help
>> > you through some rough spots at this point. I have no idea when I'll
>>have
>> > time to finish it. I have 3.5.0-rc1 running for two days now (works
>>great).
>>
> Jim, I have been working on a doc for Debian. It is unfinished but may
help
> you through some rough spots at this point. I have no idea when I'll
have
> time to finish it. I have 3.5.0-rc1 running for two days now (works
great).
> http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/image_spam2.html
> Gary
Heute (28.12.2006/00:43 Uhr) schrieb Gary V,
> http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/wiki/Downloads
> Jim, I have been working on a doc for Debian. It is unfinished but may help
> you through some rough spots at this point. I have no idea when I'll have
> time to finish it. I have 3.5.0-rc1 running for tw
Heute (28.12.2006/00:43 Uhr) schrieb Gary V,
>>
>> > are you, in fact using the SVN branch? or building from the 'release'
>>tarballs?
>>
>> > my suggestion is stick to the tarballs, for now.
>>
>> > and, if you are using the tarballs, have you applied all 3 patches?
>>
>> > iirc, the untie error
He meant that you should use:
http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/wiki/Downloads
yes, that's corrrect.
to be clear, download,
http://users.own-hero.net/~decoder/fuzzyocr/fuzzyocr-3.5.0-rc1.tar.gz
http://users.own-hero.net/~decoder/fuzzyocr/patchset1.patch
http://users.own-hero.net/~decoder/fuzz
> are you, in fact using the SVN branch? or building from the 'release'
tarballs?
> my suggestion is stick to the tarballs, for now.
> and, if you are using the tarballs, have you applied all 3 patches?
> iirc, the untie errors i'd seen were dealt with in patch #1.
> just guessing ...
I h
Jim Knuth wrote:
> Gestern (27.12.2006/22:24 Uhr) schrieb snowcrash+spamassassin,
>
>> some of this is familiar ...
>
>>> I use FuzzyOcr 3.5.x branch.
>
>> are you, in fact using the SVN branch? or building from the 'release'
>> tarballs?
>> my suggestion is stick to the tarballs, for now.
>>
Gestern (27.12.2006/22:24 Uhr) schrieb snowcrash+spamassassin,
> hi,
> some of this is familiar ...
>> I use FuzzyOcr 3.5.x branch.
> are you, in fact using the SVN branch? or building from the 'release'
> tarballs?
> my suggestion is stick to the tarballs, for now.
> and, if you are using t
hi,
some of this is familiar ...
I use FuzzyOcr 3.5.x branch.
are you, in fact using the SVN branch? or building from the 'release' tarballs?
my suggestion is stick to the tarballs, for now.
and, if you are using the tarballs, have you applied all 3 patches?
iirc, the untie errors i'd seen
Hallo und Guten Abend spamassassin-users,
I use FuzzyOcr 3.5.x branch.
If I use spamassassin --lint, here this gets:
spamassassin --lint
Subroutine FuzzyOcr::O_NONBLOCK redefined at /usr/share/perl/5.8/Exporter.pm
line 65.
at /usr/lib/perl/5.8/POSIX.pm line 19
Subroutine FuzzyOcr::debuglog red
12 matches
Mail list logo
