Re: DNSBL mirrors

2010-02-27 Thread João Gouveia
Hi Bill, - "Bill Landry" wrote: > On 2/27/2010 6:42 PM, João Gouveia wrote: > >> I don't see where you have defined any of these entries that > you're > >> using in your meta rules: > >> > >> RCVD_IN_ANBREP_L5 > >> RCVD_IN_ANBREP_L4 > >> RCVD_IN_ANBREP_L3 > >> RCVD_IN_ANBREP_Z > >> > >> Did

Re: DNSBL mirrors

2010-02-27 Thread Bill Landry
On 2/27/2010 6:42 PM, João Gouveia wrote: Hi Bill, - "Bill Landry" wrote: On 2/27/2010 5:35 PM, João Gouveia wrote: Hi all, we are aiming to provide free usage of our DNSBL to the general anti spam community as soon as possible. However, in order to do this we

Re: DNSBL mirrors

2010-02-27 Thread João Gouveia
Hi Bill, - "Bill Landry" wrote: > On 2/27/2010 5:35 PM, João Gouveia wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > we are aiming to provide free usage of our DNSBL to the general anti > spam community as soon as possible. > > However, in order to do this we would need to deploy more DNS > mirrors or we risk pr

Re: DNSBL mirrors

2010-02-27 Thread Bill Landry
On 2/27/2010 5:35 PM, João Gouveia wrote: Hi all, we are aiming to provide free usage of our DNSBL to the general anti spam community as soon as possible. However, in order to do this we would need to deploy more DNS mirrors or we risk providing a poor service due to the amount of DNS traffic

DNSBL mirrors

2010-02-27 Thread João Gouveia
Hi all, we are aiming to provide free usage of our DNSBL to the general anti spam community as soon as possible. However, in order to do this we would need to deploy more DNS mirrors or we risk providing a poor service due to the amount of DNS traffic we expect to receive. If you think you are