On 2/27/2010 5:35 PM, João Gouveia wrote:
Hi all,

we are aiming to provide free usage of our DNSBL to the general anti spam 
community as soon as possible.
However, in order to do this we would need to deploy more DNS mirrors or we 
risk providing a poor service due to the amount of DNS traffic we expect to 
receive.
If you think you are up to this (or you know someone that would be) and you 
have the necessary infrastructure and bandwidth to support a rbldnsd mirror, 
please contact me off list so we can discuss details.

This DNSBL has been running for a while now, incorporated in the SpamAssassin weekly mass 
checks and isn't exactly new (we've been operating since Feb 2008). What's new is the 
"free" part of it.

You can check the current results here (last two weeks):

http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20100220-r912093-n/%2FRCVD
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20100227-r916929-n/%2FRCVD

The relevant rule name is "T_RCVD_IN_ANBREP_BL" (aggregation of all bad 
reputation IP addresses). Note that both the rule name and the DNS zone in use will 
change to a dedicated zone (which is already up and running). If you want to test it out 
use this one instead: http://mailspike.org/anubis/implementation_sa.html .

At the moment our goal is to get enough mirrors to provide a free sustained 
service and an overall good experience to SpamAssassin users, so that in the 
future this can be included in the SpamAssassin base rules (assuming of course 
SA folks would see value in it).
I don't see where you have defined any of these entries that you're using in your meta rules:

RCVD_IN_ANBREP_L5
RCVD_IN_ANBREP_L4
RCVD_IN_ANBREP_L3
RCVD_IN_ANBREP_Z

Did you intend for these to be MSPIKE rather than ANBREP?

Bill

Reply via email to