Quoting Bill Randle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 10:08 -0400, L. Mark Stone wrote:
Started noticing the system flagging spam emails but not deleting them:
[cut]
Jun 11 07:37:18 pinot amavis[10738]: (10738-04) spam_scan: hits=24.677
tests=BAYES_99,HTML_50_60,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20,HT
Yes, discarding is not only controlled by $sa_kill_level_deflt by also by
$final_spam_desiny and whether a quarantine is configured or not, and if
quarantine is configured, then also $sa_quarantine_cutoff_level. This is
not a SpamAssassin question, it is an amavisd-new question.
Having said th
> Given the configuration, I would have expected the message to have
> been discarded. What did I miss?
By any chance did you accidentally set $final_spam_destiny to D_PASS in
the config file? There's a line that does this, but it's commented out
by default.
-Bill
Yes, discarding is n
On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 10:08 -0400, L. Mark Stone wrote:
> Started noticing the system flagging spam emails but not deleting them:
[cut]
> Jun 11 07:37:18 pinot amavis[10738]: (10738-04) spam_scan: hits=24.677
> tests=BAYES_99,HTML_50_60,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_3,HTML_T
Started noticing the system flagging spam emails but not deleting them:
Jun 11 07:37:13 pinot postfix/smtpd[8568]: connect from unknown[160.79.37.83]
Jun 11 07:37:14 pinot postfix/smtpd[8568]: 9F6CBE88001:
client=unknown[160.79.37.83]
Jun 11 07:37:16 pinot postfix/cleanup[11935]: 9F6CBE88001:
R.Brown wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Running: SA 3.1.1 on Mac OS-X
>
> This is a newbie problem!
> I've got permissions problems with my SA setup that I'm unable to sort
> out. Here is how I'm running it with spamd as the user.
>
> root 359 0.0 0.744724 11740 ?? Ss 12:42PM 0:02.14
> /
Hello,
Running: SA 3.1.1 on Mac OS-X
This is a newbie problem!
I've got permissions problems with my SA setup that I'm unable to
sort out. Here is how I'm running it with spamd as the user.
root 359 0.0 0.744724 11740 ?? Ss 12:42PM
0:02.14 /usr/bin/spamd -u spamd -d -r
Para: Jaime Aguado
CC: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Asunto: Re: Configuration issue
Jaime Aguado wrote:
> Hi all, I have spamassassin 2.64 running on a SuSE Enterprise 9
> running postfix as smtpd.
>
> My spamassassin system is leaking most spam messages (60-80%) without
> tagging
Actually I'd suspect it was amavis doing the rewriting. I understand
it simply uses SA as a score mechanism and discards its markups unless
you tell it otherwise somehow.
Either way it's not an SA issue so you can expect confusion here.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Jaime Aguado" <[E
Jaime Aguado wrote:
> Hi all, I have spamassassin 2.64 running on a SuSE Enterprise 9 running
> postfix as smtpd.
>
> My spamassassin system is leaking most spam messages (60-80%) without
> tagging them.
> I have done some configuration tests:
>
> # spamassassin --lint gives no output error.
>
> #
Jaime,
btw: any special reason you plan to use SA 2.64 with local tests only?
I'd recommend upgrading to the latest and greatest stable version which
can be found (as RPMs for SLES9 on Intel) at
http://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/choeger/spamassassin/i386/sles9/
Take care as the config requires cha
Do you run amavisd-new (which is shipped with SLES9, I think)
If you do, there's the culprit: amavisd-new does its own spam testing
using the spamassassin code directly (not via spamc/spamd)
Details can be found at http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/#faq-spam
Likey you didn't configure amavisd-
ED]
Enviado el: viernes, 27 de enero de 2006 13:49
Para: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Asunto: Re: Configuration issue
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=9.7 required=4.0
This says it is spam. The X-Spam-Report also says that.
It would seem you have aproblem in Postfix, that it is doing something
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=9.7 required=4.0
This says it is spam. The X-Spam-Report also says that.
It would seem you have aproblem in Postfix, that it is doing something wrong
with the message.
Loren
Hi all, I have spamassassin 2.64 running on a SuSE Enterprise 9 running
postfix as smtpd.
My spamassassin system is leaking most spam messages (60-80%) without
tagging them.
I have done some configuration tests:
# spamassassin --lint gives no output error.
# spamassassin < /tmp/spam-message
[..
15 matches
Mail list logo
