Re: Certain types of spam seem to get through SA

2014-08-29 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 16:55 -0600, LuKreme wrote: > On 28 Aug 2014, at 17:38 , Martin Gregorie wrote: > > http://www.libelle-systems.com/free/portmanteau/portmanteau.tgz > > > > This file is a compressed source archive that includes documentation for > > the tool and the definition file format. >

Re: Certain types of spam seem to get through SA

2014-08-29 Thread LuKreme
On 28 Aug 2014, at 17:38 , Martin Gregorie wrote: > http://www.libelle-systems.com/free/portmanteau/portmanteau.tgz > > This file is a compressed source archive that includes documentation for > the tool and the definition file format. Any reason not to include your dataset? -- If at first you

Re: Certain types of spam seem to get through SA

2014-08-28 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 17:42 -0500, Robert A. Ober wrote: > If you find a solution without my having to write more rules I would > appreciate you letting the list know. > This may not be what you want to know, but. Some time back I was subscribed to a mailing list that was linked to a web for

Re: Certain types of spam seem to get through SA

2014-08-28 Thread Robert A. Ober
On 8/28/14, 3:17 PM, LuKreme wrote: On Aug 28, 2014, at 12:00, Martin Gregorie wrote: The only obvious oddity, compared with my local main stream is its direct one-hop delivery. I'd regard this as UCE rather than spam per se. I only take measures against this type of mail if I see it more frequ

Re: Certain types of spam seem to get through SA

2014-08-28 Thread LuKreme
> On Aug 28, 2014, at 12:00, Martin Gregorie wrote: > > The only obvious oddity, compared with my local main stream is its > direct one-hop delivery. I'd regard this as UCE rather than spam per se. > I only take measures against this type of mail if I see it more > frequently than every 6 months

Re: Certain types of spam seem to get through SA

2014-08-28 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 09:31 -0600, LuKreme wrote: > On 28 Aug 2014, at 09:21 , Antony Stone > wrote: > > Please post pastebin samples of the actual email content (as well as > > minimally-anonymised headers) so that others can check on known-working > > configurations. > > The only thing I cha

Re: Certain types of spam seem to get through SA

2014-08-28 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 09:15 -0600, LuKreme wrote: > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.covisp.net > X-Spam-Level: * > X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=URIBL_BLACK autolearn=no > version=3.3.2 > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_H

Re: Certain types of spam seem to get through SA

2014-08-28 Thread LuKreme
On 28 Aug 2014, at 09:21 , Antony Stone wrote: > Please post pastebin samples of the actual email content (as well as > minimally-anonymised headers) so that others can check on known-working > configurations. The only thing I changed was the mail address it was sent to.

Re: Certain types of spam seem to get through SA

2014-08-28 Thread Antony Stone
On Thursday 28 August 2014 at 17:15:43 (EU time), LuKreme wrote: > I’ve been getting a lot of auto sales, windows install, and pharma spam > recently that is getting through SA. Here are headers for one from this > morning: Please post pastebin samples of the actual email content (as well as min

Certain types of spam seem to get through SA

2014-08-28 Thread LuKreme
I’ve been getting a lot of auto sales, windows install, and pharma spam recently that is getting through SA. Here are headers for one from this morning: Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.covisp.net X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5