On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 09:31 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> On 28 Aug 2014, at 09:21 , Antony Stone
> <antony.st...@spamassassin.open.source.it> wrote:
> > Please post pastebin samples of the actual email content (as well as
> > minimally-anonymised headers) so that others can check on known-working
> > configurations.
>
> The only thing I changed was the mail address it was sent to.
>
> <http://pastebin.com/3agBfQT2>
>
Here are the hits I get:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=8.6 required=6.0 tests=MG_WRONG_DOMAIN,
RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLACK,URIBL_DBL_SPAM,
URI_OPTOUT_USME autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
The only local rule is MG_WRONG_DOMAIN, which adds 0.01 to the score
because its only used as part of local meta-rules.
The only obvious oddity, compared with my local main stream is its
direct one-hop delivery. I'd regard this as UCE rather than spam per se.
I only take measures against this type of mail if I see it more
frequently than every 6 months or so and/or if it has an 'unsubscribe'
facility which fails to work.
Martin
Martin
