Re: Bayes now changed to autolearn=unavailable.

2012-02-27 Thread RW
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:17:49 +0100 Simon Loewenthal wrote: > >> BAYES_00 and BAYES_99 hit on other ham/spam without any problem. > >> Only then the result will mention autolearn=disabled instead of > >> autolearn=unavailable. I don't follow why it would be unavailable > >> for non-shortcirtcuite

Re: Bayes now changed to autolearn=unavailable.

2012-02-27 Thread Simon Loewenthal
On 27/02/12 15:29, Simon Loewenthal wrote: > On 27/02/12 15:24, Simon Loewenthal wrote: >> On 27/02/12 13:55, RW wrote: >>> On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:48:50 +0100 >>> Simon Loewenthal wrote: >>> >>> Recently I enabled shortcircuit for ham on a server because Bayes seems reasonably well tr

Re: Bayes now changed to autolearn=unavailable.

2012-02-27 Thread Simon Loewenthal
On 27/02/12 15:24, Simon Loewenthal wrote: > On 27/02/12 13:55, RW wrote: >> On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:48:50 +0100 >> Simon Loewenthal wrote: >> >> >>> Recently I enabled shortcircuit for ham on a server because Bayes >>> seems reasonably well trained. It works well. >>> >>> I noticed that emails

Re: Bayes now changed to autolearn=unavailable.

2012-02-27 Thread Simon Loewenthal
On 27/02/12 13:55, RW wrote: > On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:48:50 +0100 > Simon Loewenthal wrote: > > >> Recently I enabled shortcircuit for ham on a server because Bayes >> seems reasonably well trained. It works well. >> >> I noticed that emails that did not hit BAYES_00 (so no shortcircuit) >> wer

Re: Bayes now changed to autolearn=unavailable.

2012-02-27 Thread RW
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:48:50 +0100 Simon Loewenthal wrote: > Recently I enabled shortcircuit for ham on a server because Bayes > seems reasonably well trained. It works well. > > I noticed that emails that did not hit BAYES_00 (so no shortcircuit) > were not autolearnt by SA. Even though the

Re: Bayes now changed to autolearn=unavailable.

2012-02-27 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 2/27/12 5:48 AM, Simon Loewenthal wrote: seems reasonably well trained. It works well. I noticed that emails that did not hit BAYES_00 (so no shortcircuit) were not autolearnt by SA. Even though these were well below the autolearn threshold of -1. In the example below, the score was -7.8. B

Bayes now changed to autolearn=unavailable.

2012-02-27 Thread Simon Loewenthal
Good morning everyone, Recently I enabled shortcircuit for ham on a server because Bayes seems reasonably well trained. It works well. I noticed that emails that did not hit BAYES_00 (so no shortcircuit) were not autolearnt by SA. Even though these were well below the autolearn threshold of -