On Sun, 27 Apr 2014, Axb wrote:
On 04/27/2014 06:02 PM, John Hardin wrote:
Then wipe and retrain again.
I'd definitely go for that
oldest spam in bayes is from Thu, 01 Sep 2011 23:29:40 GMT
0.000 0 1314919780 0 non-token data: oldest atime
The DB just hasn't enough spam
On 04/27/2014 06:02 PM, John Hardin wrote:
Then wipe and retrain again.
I'd definitely go for that
oldest spam in bayes is from Thu, 01 Sep 2011 23:29:40 GMT
0.000 0 1314919780 0 non-token data: oldest atime
The DB just hasn't enough spam to make a difference.
On Sat, 26 Apr 2014, Brian Eliassen wrote:
Yes, I had that much spam stored up.
Good.
I cannot figure out why BAYES_00 would hit on these.
First, do you have autolearn enabled? If so, I would turn it off until the
basic initial Bayes training is proven.
Second, if spams are hitting BAYE
Check bayes settings, did you train as same user as mimedefang runs as if not
using sql bayes backend, is your setup global bayes or pr user setup?
--
Sendt fra min Android telefon med K-9 Mail. Undskyld hvis jeg er lidt
kortfattet.
Hello Keepers of SpamAssassin Knowledge,
I've been lurking on this list for years and never had a question pop
up until today. About a week ago I said, "enough is enough" regarding
the amount of spam I've been receiving so I've been doing some
upgrades. As such, I recently upgraded to SA
